What if the universe is shrinking instead of expanding?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tobbzn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of whether the universe is shrinking instead of expanding, examining implications of space expansion and the nature of the universe. Participants engage with theoretical ideas and analogies, questioning established cosmological models and the relationship between space and atomic size.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the universe doesn't expand into anything, it could imply that the universe is shrinking, which would allow for an increase in space between objects without a traditional expansion.
  • Another participant argues that the mathematical equivalence of the universe expanding and atoms getting smaller means there is no real difference between the two scenarios.
  • A different viewpoint questions the logical correlation between space expanding and the universe not expanding, asserting that both cannot occur simultaneously under the same description.
  • One participant notes the observational finiteness of the universe, suggesting it may not be spatially finite, which adds complexity to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between space expansion and the universe's characteristics, with no consensus reached on whether the universe is shrinking or expanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various analogies and mathematical equivalences, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of space and atomic size, as well as the implications of observational limits on the universe.

Tobbzn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm a first year physics student, and I've recently read up on some wikipedia cosmology and talked to some people who are far more experienced in this field than I am. I've come across things such as the balloon analogy, which made sort of sense until I heard that the universe doesn't expand into anything.

So, space between objects expands (and accelerated too), but the universe doesn't expand into anything? That doesn't sound right. Seems like a paradox. Now, I know there are paradoxes in nature, but the more I thought about it, the more I thought it seemed like it implied a different explanation.

Now, imagine a spherical glass ball in which the universe lies. Imagine, if you will, a cube grid stretching through it. Now, if space expands everywhere, then the balloon analogy would imply more grid space between points, but if the universe doesn't expand into anything, in order to fit the extra grid cubes, you'd have to shrink each cube in size in comparison to the absolute size of the entire universe.

What if that's what is happening? It would explain why space seems to expand but the universe doesn't expand into anything (On a related note, how did we find that out?), if, in fact, we were instead shrinking (and, I suppose, diminishing the speed of light by an equal factor).

When I asked this question to a friend, I was directed to ask at this forum, and I hope I could get some clarification on this subject.
 
Space news on Phys.org
You can make things look pretty much any way you want by "measuring" things in ways unrelated to the geometry of space-time.
 
Mayhaps so, but even if this is an inconsequential explanation, it seems less paradoxical to me.
 
There isn't actually any difference between the universe expanding and atoms getting smaller. The two scenarios are mathematically identical.

We just don't talk about atoms getting smaller because we measure everything around us in terms of the size of atoms, and thus consider them to be constant in size.
 
Then what is the logical correlation between space expanding and the universe not expanding?
 
Tobbzn said:
Then what is the logical correlation between space expanding and the universe not expanding?
Well, you have one or the other. You can't sensibly talk about both happening under the same description. Either space is expanding (and, in turn, so is the universe), or space isn't expanding (and neither is the universe), but atoms are shrinking.
 
The problem is the universe is observationally finite, but, not necessarily spatially finite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
10K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
785
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K