teng:
Forget subsequences, lim infs and all that.
Those concepts won't help you a bit, because you betray an uncertainness abut the very concept of a limit in the first place.
Let us take a typical textbook definition:
"We say that a number L is a LIMIT of a sequence a_{n}[/tex] if for any \epsilon&gt;0 there exists a number N, so that for any n>N, |a_{n}-L|&lt;\epsilon"<br />
Furthermore, a sequence is said to diverge if no such number L exists.<br />
<br />
1. The first thing to note is that L (if it exists) is a NUMBER, and only that.<br />
It is not a hand-wavy action by which we describe the function's behaviour. It is a number. Period.<br />
<br />
2. Secondly, the definition should be regarded as a recipe of detemining whether or not an arbitrarily chosen L is a limit to the sequence or not.<br />
<br />
3. Let us for convenience sake pick L=2 first, and check whether it can be said to be a limit to the sequence:<br />
<br />
Consider the absolute valued difference: |2(-1)^{n}-2|<br />
Now, when n is even, this difference equals 0, but when n is odd, the difference equals 4.<br />
Thus, by picking \epsilon&lt;4, and remembering that odd numbers can be arbitrarily big, we see that there cannot exist a number N so that for ANY n>N, the difference is less than \epsilon<br />
<br />
Thus, 2 cannot be regarded as a limit L to our sequence.<br />
<br />
<br />
Do you think -2 can be a limit?<br />
What about any other number?<br />
Answer those questions, and you have the answer to your own question.