What is a Streamlined Design Engine and How Does it Improve Fuel Economy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter delta_mu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A streamlined design engine refers to the aerodynamic shape of a vehicle, which is optimized using wind-tunnel testing to reduce air resistance. This design minimizes energy loss due to frictional forces, allowing more fuel energy to be utilized effectively. Recent advancements in automotive design, influenced by racing technologies, focus on enhancing airflow and reducing vehicle weight by simplifying components. Additionally, the term "streamlined" can apply to improving overall efficiency in various processes, not just aerodynamics. Understanding these principles can significantly enhance fuel economy in vehicles.
delta_mu
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I Have A Puzzling Question!

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A STREAMLINED DESIGN ENGINE IS AND HOW IT IMPROVES THE FUEL ECONOMY.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming you are in the "energy" chapter of your texbook?

"Streamline designed" is referring to the shape of the car (not the engine) which was designed with the use of a wind-tunnel. The result is a reduction of air resistance on the car. This means less of the car's energy is lost to "fricitonal" forces. So therefore more of the car's fuel energy remains as ... (you know)
 
Thanks a lot. That helped so much.
 
Ahem it might very well be respective of recent design improvements that are following racing technologies inasmuch as the intake manifolds are polished to un-restrict airflow, many design features are to improve (by reduction) the motors weight, reduce the number of components (other then the computerized pieces that have been added) as to make the processes of assembly, design, (itself) and repair, more efficient and accessable...

Streamlined doesn't just refer to airflow principals it is and can be used as a general term for making processes smoother, making operation smoother, that kinda thing...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top