What Is an Example of an Ambiguous Integral Due to Cancellation of Areas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chjopl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Integral
AI Thread Summary
An ambiguous integral can arise from the cancellation of areas when integrating functions that have both positive and negative values. For instance, the integral of f(x) = x^2 over the interval (-infinity, infinity) results in an ambiguous answer of infinity due to the cancellation of areas. This occurs because the function is not integrable from 0 to infinity and is an odd function. To avoid such ambiguities, it's essential to analyze the properties of the function and consider breaking the integral into separate intervals. Understanding the concept of area cancellation is vital for accurate integral evaluation.
chjopl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Give an example of an integral on (-infinity, infinity) that will lead to an ambigious answer if we evaluate the interal in terms of cancellation of areas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm, sounds like you want a function that is NOT integrable from 0 to infinity and is an odd function. ( f(x)= x leaps to mind.) Do you see WHY that leads to an "ambiguous answer"?
 


The cancellation of areas is a concept in mathematics that refers to the cancellation of positive and negative areas in an integral, resulting in an ambiguous answer. This can occur when the function being integrated has both positive and negative values over the interval of integration.

For example, let us consider the integral of the function f(x) = x^2 on the interval (-infinity, infinity). This integral can be evaluated using the fundamental theorem of calculus as follows:

∫_-∞^∞ x^2 dx = [(x^3)/3]_-∞^∞ = ∞ - (-∞) = ∞ + ∞

Here, we can see that the positive and negative areas cancel out, resulting in an ambiguous answer of infinity plus infinity. This is because the function f(x) = x^2 has both positive and negative values over the entire real line, leading to the cancellation of areas.

In situations like this, it is important to carefully consider the properties of the function being integrated and the limits of integration to avoid the cancellation of areas. In this case, we could avoid the ambiguity by breaking up the integral into two separate integrals over the intervals (-∞, 0) and (0, ∞), where the function has only positive or negative values respectively.

In conclusion, the cancellation of areas can lead to an ambiguous answer when evaluating integrals. It is crucial to be aware of this concept and carefully consider the properties of the function and limits of integration to avoid any potential ambiguities.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top