What is and is not Mainstream Astrophysics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
AI Thread Summary
Astrophysics relies on observational data to distinguish between competing theories, leading to scientific evolution based on logical reasoning rather than opinion. Published papers present alternative theories that contribute to this discourse. The community does not need to wait for textbooks to be updated to engage in discussions about these theories. However, the forum emphasizes adherence to its rules regarding speculative posts, suggesting that deeper discussions should occur in peer-reviewed journals instead. The need for clarity in what constitutes mainstream astrophysics remains a topic of contention.
Saul
Messages
271
Reaction score
4
Astrophysics is an observational science.

When there is observational data in published papers that distinguishes between one theory and another, typically science changes. There are published papers that describe the competing theory.

Science is not an opinion poll. There must be logical reasons why we believe what we believe. That is the definition of science.

We do not need to wait until textbooks are re-published.

What is required in addition to observational data?

This subject needs to be discussed.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This seems to be a thinly veiled complaint about what is and is not permitted here. I would encourage you to re-read the PF Rules you agreed to when you signed up, particularly the section on overly speculative posts.

The subject may need to be discussed, but it doesn't have to be discussed here. Peer-reviewed journals are the place for that discussion.
 

Thread 'How feasible is home radio astronomy?'

Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Strange spiral structure in Oort Cloud, outer Solar System
Replies
2
Views
1K
A A pair of interesting papers: have counterarguments been published?
Replies
10
Views
2K
NASA discovers water on the moon
Replies
21
Views
5K
Testing C & Python Resources for Problems in Astrophysics for upcoming CS Exam
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Schrödinger Evolution of Self-Gravitating Disks
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Observations fit poorly with the Standard Model of Cosmology
Replies
34
Views
4K
I Composition of the Sun: How We Know via Spectral Absorption Lines
Replies
10
Views
3K
A Is Fatio–Le Sage's theory of gravitation an entropic gravity?
Replies
33
Views
2K
B Free Online Lecture: Seeing the Unseeable - Capturing an Image of a Black Hole
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Is nonlinear acoustics in mainstream physics?
Replies
42
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top