What is Ann's final position in different reference frames?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining Ann's final position in both her own reference frame and Betty's frame after following specific walking instructions. George, the original poster, is confused about how to approach the problem due to the lack of information on their relative velocities. Bill suggests that without knowing their speeds, the problem cannot be accurately solved, while also noting that Ann's position in her own frame is straightforward. The conversation highlights the complexities of reference frames in relativity, particularly when directions and velocities are not clearly defined. Ultimately, the participants agree that more information is needed to provide a definitive answer.
Sanjay87
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm quite new to relativity and I'm just going through some problems from past exam papers to prepare for an upcoming subject. The following question has me a little stumped:

Betty is at the origin of her frame of reference. At a certain point in time, this also corresponds to the origin of Ann's reference frame. Betty gives Ann the following instructions: walk 1km East, 2km North and 3km East. (there is an x-y graph pictured, indicating that 1km East corresponds to local co-ordinates (1,0) and 1km North corresponds to local co-ordinates (0,1)). The questions are - What is Ann's final position in her own frame? What is Ann's final position in Betty's frame?

Presumably, Ann and Betty are in different reference frames S and S' respectively, with S' moving at constant speed v relative to S.

I hope somebody can help me.

Kind Regards,
George
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sanjay87 said:
Betty gives Ann the following instructions: walk 1km East, 2km North and 3km East. (there is an x-y graph pictured, indicating that 1km East corresponds to local co-ordinates (1,0) and 1km North corresponds to local co-ordinates (0,1)). The questions are - What is Ann's final position in her own frame? What is Ann's final position in Betty's frame?

I suspect that Ann's position within her own frame is trivial (since she is the origin of her own frame), but you should note that directions of "East" and "North" generally refer to angular directions on a (presumably) spherical surface.

Regards,

Bill
 
Presumably, Ann and Betty are in different reference frames S and S' respectively, with S' moving at constant speed v relative to S.
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?
 
Mentz114 said:
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?

heh-heh..

What if Betty told Ann how fast to walk?:smile:

I think the relations regarding N/E and x,y imply that Betty and Ann have the same velocity with respect to something infinitely far away.

Then again, if Betty told Ann to change her altitude, there would be a problem...

Regards,

Bill
 
Mentz114 said:
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?

This is why the question has stumped me. The way the question is worded, Betty and Ann are in different reference frames which must be moving at some velocity relative to each other, and perhaps they expect the answer to be in the form of variables - e.g. x' = 2+vt. Or have I misunderstood the question (I suspect that I have misunderstood it).
 
Hi again,

Using the Galilean transformations, I would say that in Betty's frame, Ann is at position (-2+vt, 2). But it worries me that no velocity has been given. The response from Antenna Guy makes sense so in that case both parties would agree that Ann is at (-2,2). What do you think?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top