What is considered a small velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fellowroot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the ambiguity of defining a "small velocity" in physics problems, particularly in the context of an elevator being pulled upwards. Participants express frustration over the lack of specific velocity values, which complicates problem-solving. Suggestions include using average elevator speeds or arbitrary small values like 0.01 m/s as assumptions. The conversation highlights a broader issue in physics where multiple assumptions are often necessary to arrive at a solution, contrasting it with more straightforward mathematical problems. Ultimately, the challenge lies in navigating these assumptions to find a workable answer.
Fellowroot
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An elevator is being pulled upwards with an small inital velocity. The elevator cable has a constant tension. After 250 seconds it stops with a gravitational energy of 2400J. Assume the acceleration due to gravity is 10. What is the mass of the elevator?

Homework Equations



PE=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume what v is then see how high it is then plug into find m.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, when a problem says that something is traveling at a small velocity, but does not state what velocity to use, what should we take it as.

This is actually what I don't like about physics. In math if I am given an integral to solve I don't assume anything, I just do it.

I remember in thermodynamics, there was this one problem about a turbine and I tried very very hard to solve it without looking at the solutions manual. Then finally I gave up and looked at the manual and guess what. There was like 3 different assumptions you had to make an order to solve it. Thanks a lot physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe try looking up the average speed of an elevator and take half of that ... or just go with .01 m/s.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top