What Is Degeneracy in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyzmatix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy
phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0
First of all, I just want to check if my understanding of degeneracy is correct:

The degeneracy of an excited state is the number of combinations of quantum numbers that will result in the same energy level.

?

Secondly, if this is right and if we have an equation

E_{xy}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(n_x^2+n_y^2)

from which we wish to obtain the four lowest possible energy levels and their corresponding degeneracies, then is it correct to do that as follows

E_{11}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(1^2+1^2)=2\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}

E_{12}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(1^2+2^2)=5\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}

E_{21}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(2^2+1^2)=5\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}

E_{22}=\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}(2^2+2^2)=8\frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2ma^2}

With corresponding degeneracies

E_{11} = 1
E_{12}=E_{21}=2
E_{22}=1

I'm not sure if there's an equation that could be useful to calculate the degeneracy perhaps?

Thanks in advance!
phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The degeneracy of an energy level is the number of different states having that energy.
(you better say state than quantum numbers).

How much of quantum mechanics have you done?
Do you know how the calculate the eigenvalues and eigenstates, given the matrix of an operator?
That is how you find out degeneracies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top