What Is Δκ in the Superposition of Waves in Quantum Physics?

tjkubo
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I am trying read through a chapter on properties of matter waves in Eisberg & Resnick's Quantum Physics. In section 3-4, a superposition Ψ of 7 sinusoidal waves, each with a different reciprical wavelength and amplitude, is shown along with all the component waves(fig. 3-9). He defines the extent of the group Δx as the maximum amplitude to half-maximum amplitude width of Ψ and estimates that it is about 1/12, which I understand from looking at the figure. However, we then defines Δκ as "the range of reciprical wavelengths of the components of Ψ from maximum amplitude to half-maximum amplitude" and estimates that it is about 1. I don't quite understand this definition, or how he estimated Δκ from the figure. Can someone carefully explain what he's doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have your book so I can make only general comments. It is established from the theory of Fourier transforms that an uncertainty relation exists between the deviation of a variable and that of its spectrum,
\Delta x \Delta k \geq \frac{1}{2}
If you define dx as the ratio of FWHM to peak amplitude (the inverse of what you said), then dk should be defined the same way and not as you wrote. For dx=1/12, we'd then expect dk=6.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top