What is Gauss's Law for a Concentric Cable?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law can be applied to a concentric cable with an inner conductor carrying a linear charge density of λ = 6.10 nC/m and an outer conductor with no net charge. The electric field can be determined for different radial distances (R) from the axis, specifically for R between 1.50 cm and 6.50 cm. The formula derived from Gauss's Law shows that the electric field E is equal to λ divided by 2πɛo multiplied by r squared. Additionally, the surface charge densities on the inner and outer surfaces of the outer conductor can be calculated using the relationship between total charge and length. Understanding these principles allows for the analysis of electric fields in infinitely long cylindrical systems.
ndoc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure below shows a portion of an infinitely long, concentric cable in cross section. The inner conductor has a linear charge density of λ = 6.10 nC/m and the outer conductor has no net charge.

http://www.webassign.net/tipler/23-36alt.gif

(a) Find the electric field for all values of R, where R is the perpendicular distance from the common axis of the cylindrical system. (Use R as necessary.)
1.50 cm R 4.50 cm
R 6.50 cm

(b) What are the surface charge densities on the inside and the outside surfaces of the outer conductor?

Homework Equations



∫EdA = Qinside/ɛo

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equation I would get E(2pi*r^2*h) = Qenclosed/ɛo, but it is infinite in length and therefore no height is given. Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then you would just have a surface charge per unit length of the infinitely long conductor. That is the beauty of the infinitely long objects.

Thanks
Matt
 
Hi ndoc,

Surface density (λ) = Total charge (Q)/Length.

If you set Gauss's law equivalent to a general form of Coulomb's law, EA=Q/ɛo, you will find that the cylinder's height, or length, does not have any significance.

i.e.,

E*[2pi(r^2)*h]= (λ*h)/ɛo =>

E=λ/[2piɛo*(r^2)]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top