What Is "Hello, I Found From Junk

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmex
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying a component found in junk, which is confirmed to be part of a turbocharger, specifically the "core" that compresses and expands air. Users explore the possibility of repurposing this component for a small jet engine, noting that turbochargers can indeed be used in amateur turbojet designs. Key challenges include ensuring quality shaft bushing and forced lubrication, as well as managing axial pressure on the center bearing. The conversation highlights the importance of precise engineering tolerances to prevent air leakages that could lead to mechanical failure. Overall, while creating a functional turbine is less critical, the success of the compressor design is essential for efficient operation.
jmex
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
Hello,

I found this from junk. Can you tell me what this is?
uploadfromtaptalk1403523304561.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1403523312385.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Turbocharger? One impeller compresses air, the other impeller expands it.
 
Yes, it is part of a turbocharger. Called the "core" it sits inside a housing that ducts the air.
 
thanks for your help. I am willing to use impeller and compressor in a jet engine out of it. Is it possible to use this existing design?
 
I mean a small one.
 
Possibly yes, turbochargers are used to make amateur turbojets. There are many out there. Search the web for sites.

The problems you will have is the quality of the shaft bushing and the provision of forced lubrication. The shape of the outer case of the rotor balances the forces on the centre bearing. You will have to design for that axial pressure.

The material used for the turbines is often different for a diesel or a gasoline engine. You will need to keep your exhaust temperature cool enough, and with the right oxygen level to prevent corrosion or melting of the turbine.
 
There are plenty of jet engine designs on the web that use a turbocharger as the compressor. But if you don't have the outer casing of the turbo as well as the rotor you showed in the pictures, that rather defeats the reason for using it, which is that building a small efficient compressor needs a "Swiss watchmaking" level engineering tolerances to be successful, otherwise air leakages between the rotor and casing will make it liable to stall and/or surge, or mechanically self-destruct if the rotor touches the casing at high RPM.

Making a turbine that is "good enough" for a working engine is much less critical. Unlike compressors, the performance of a badly designed or inefficient turbine usually degrades in a "stable" manner, rather than catastrophically.

Here's a cut-away "real world" engine from the 1950s with twin radial compressors. Note, most of the structure "in front of" the compressors (at the left of the picture) is the reduction gearbox to drive the aircraft propeller, not part of the engine itself.

748px-Rolls_royce_dart_turboprop.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's a very good picture! Thanks for sharing!
 
Back
Top