What is "Modern Quantum Simulation" experimentation?

Gerinski
Messages
322
Reaction score
15
Hi all,

In this paper they mention that the "experiments" were done using "quantum simulation". Expressions like the following are used:

"Here we experimentally simulate the nonlinear behaviour of a qubit..."

"Modern experimental quantum simulation allows one to ask meaningful questions that provide insights into the behaviour of complex quantum systems"

"Our experimental simulation of a qubit in the pure state..."

"Quantum simulation is a versatile and powerful tool for investigating quantum systems that are hard or even impossible to access in practice"

http://www.nature.com/articles/ncom...&tracking_referrer=www.scientificamerican.com

What is such a "quantum simulation experiment"? Is it a real physical experiment? Or a computer simulated one? How can be quantum behaviour simulated not using a quantum computer or quantum process? Is it about modelling, or mapping, a complex quantum process into some simpler physical quantum system such as studying photons polarization behaviour? If so, how confident can we be that such simple models provide a reliable mapping for the way more complex systems behave?

TX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The principle is very similar to an analogue computer. Before digital computers became commonplace analogue computers were (and in some cases still are) used in many applications that requires fast solution of mathematical problems (in.e.g. control system for aircraft). The idea is to create one system that is mathematically equivalent to another. The most common case was to create analogue electrical circuits (using capacitors, inductors etc) that were arranged in such a way that the differential equations that governed their behaviors were identical to the behavior of some mechanical system you wanted to simulate.

Quantum simulators work in the same way. The idea is to create a "simple" controllable system that is mathematically identical (in the simplest case it might have the same effective Hamiltonian) to some other more complicated (and not easily controlled) system you want to simulate.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top