What is normal air pressure in N/cm^2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of normal air pressure, specifically questioning the implications of 1 kg/cm² of pressure and how it affects the human body and the environment. Participants explore the nature of pressure, equilibrium with atmospheric conditions, and the physiological effects of pressure differences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the concept of pressure, questioning how 1 kg/cm² can exert such an effect without being felt.
  • Another participant explains that pressure is not felt when in equilibrium with the atmosphere, highlighting that pressure differences are what create sensations.
  • There is a discussion about the human body's adaptation to atmospheric pressure and how pressure differentials can lead to physical sensations, such as during scuba diving or changes in altitude.
  • Some participants argue that 1 kg/cm² is not an enormous pressure compared to other physical thresholds, such as the crushing strength of bone.
  • One participant raises a hypothetical scenario about what would happen if atmospheric pressure were 100 kg/cm², questioning the implications of such a change.
  • Another participant discusses the adaptation of marine life to high-pressure environments, suggesting that life can thrive under extreme conditions that would be harmful to humans.
  • There are inquiries about the mechanics of breathing and how pressure changes facilitate inhalation and exhalation, with some confusion about the relationship between pressure, volume, and the number of air molecules.
  • A later post introduces a technical perspective on air pressure, describing it in terms of molecular impacts and the balance of internal and external pressures on the body.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement regarding the nature of pressure and its effects. There is no consensus on the implications of 1 kg/cm² of pressure, with some participants contesting its significance and others providing explanations that do not resolve the underlying confusion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of pressure, particularly in relation to breathing mechanics and the physiological effects of pressure differences. The discussion includes unresolved questions about how pressure is measured and the assumptions underlying the participants' reasoning.

  • #31
rogerk8 said:
Even your simple straw-example gets me puzzled. A tall straw would mean a "high" weight of air that I need to suck before I can get me any air. But what has this to do with pressure? The straw has a tiny area and if the pressure is constant regarding my inhale performance, the force on the (weight of the) air inside the straw will be low, thus making it hard to breath. Because in the same time I could take a M5 nut and breath through it's hole without problem.
Sorry, I worded that wrong. What I meant to say was suck water through a really tall straw. It is a good way to demonstrate just how weak our lungs are/how little pressure difference they can deal with.

The opposite side of that coin is a tall snorkel under water. Since the air inside the snorkel is at atmospheric pressure, the pressure in your lungs will be a little lower than the pressure outside your lungs (from the water pressing in). You don't have to go very deep for it to become impossible to breathe through a snorkel.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
rogerk8 said:
Finally I just want to state the most interesting part of what I've learned (along with the pressure difference part):

1) Water pressure increases 1 atm per 10m (thank you SteamKing)
2) Neither pressure nor density is linear above some 5km (temperature varies too).
2) The atmosphere is as high as 100km which is a full magnitude higher than I thought and linearly calculated
3) Scuba divers suffer from drunkness after only a few atm and thus breaths Helium instead of Nitrogen (thank you dauto).

Roger

On point 2). Atmospheric pressure and density aren't linear below 5km either. An exponential decay is a much better description.
 
  • #33
dauto said:
On point 2). Atmospheric pressure and density aren't linear below 5km either. An exponential decay is a much better description.

Sorry, but viewing this picture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth#Pressure_and_thickness tells me that you are wrong.

Both pressure, density and even temperature (from some 280K@sealevel to 220K@10km) seams quite linear to me. Point 2) height should even be changed to 10km.

Considering the common expression for pressure in a "closed" system above and the two me's I have come to the conlusion that the differential pressure for our lungs are around +/-0,1atm and thus a full magnitude higher than my preliminary guess.

The way I have calculated this is:

p\propto 1/V

Esimating our lungs volume to be some 5L, the rest breathing being some +/-0,5L and the normal pressure being 1 atm we roughly get +/-0,1atm.

Now, my deep water me experience 500atm and we both need the same amount of molecules. This wile the much higher pressure ensures higher molecular density (due to V and for simplicity, T being the same). This in turn means that the deep water me needs 500 times lower relative pressure for the same amount of molecules. And we wind up with the same differential breathing pressure. Hope this is right.

One last puzzling but extremely trivial example. This is however an example where pressure is not omnidirectional which I think is important to point out.

Consider a one ft plastic tube of say 1cm^2 cross sectional area, A. We thus have a pea-tube for shooting peas. Pressing our exhale into the tube and omitting the leakage around the pea, the (omnidirectional) pressure is suddenly turned into a force (of direction) by p*A.

Rediculous example, yet interesting somehow :smile:

Roger
PS
What is actually the use for

p=nkT≈nE_k[J/m^3]

when it comes to plasma physics?

What does p help us understand/enable?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
rogerk8 said:
Sorry, but viewing this picture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth#Pressure_and_thickness tells me that you are wrong.

Both pressure, density and even temperature (from some 280K@sealevel to 220K@10km) seams quite linear to me. Point 2) height should even be changed to 10km.

Sorry, but actually solving the equations should tell you that I'm right. Do not rely on simple visual inspection of a sketch.
 
  • #35
Does not the skin of the fish deep down in water suffer from the high pressure?

Let's say that the fish lives down at 5km with 500atm of pressure.

This pressure is both outside of its body and inside of its body so it summarizes to zero.

But how about its skin?

It has got to be affected by some force like p*A?

Or?

Roger
 
  • #36
Why is the skin any different than any other part of its body?
 
  • #37
The thought is that pressure from the outside of its skin is pressing equally much from the inside of its skin.

And putting one finger of my left hand against one finger of my right hand with increasing force/pressure makes me think that that guys skin is rough.

Don't you think so too?

Roger
 
  • #38
I ask again. Why is the skin different from any other part of its body?
 
  • #39
I totally get it now.

Consider a lidless and bottomless box of fragile ginger bread (that we say is water resistant). Let's place this fragile frame at a table (1atm) first. Being causious it will stand unharmed.

Now, moving it slowly down into water it will remain unharmed regardless of depth and therefore pressure!

It is not until we move it at a certain speed (especially sideways) according to

p=1/2\rho v^2
that we generate an additional pressure component which will destroy the frame.

In other words, ambient pressure has no effect whatsoever (it just states that there is some fluid available). It's the density of the fluid and speed of the object, in this case, that has effect. More generally, "felt" pressure is indeed differential.

Roger and out :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #40
We're simply used to 1 atm, hence we don't feel it. If you can, go to few hundred meters below the ground level, you'll start to feel something's different :D
 
  • #41
lendav_rott said:
We're simply used to 1 atm, hence we don't feel it. If you can, go to few hundred meters below the ground level, you'll start to feel something's different :D
Not correct. You need to reread the thread.
 
  • #42
Hello I'm a pilot
I was discussin with a friend about the center of gravity of an aircraft n we didn't agree
This is my question :
We all know that the center of gravity moves forward and aft the question is
Does the center of gravity moves up and down??
Lookin forward for a reply

ThxSent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
  • #43
B737 said:
Hello I'm a pilot
I was discussin with a friend about the center of gravity of an aircraft n we didn't agree
This is my question :
We all know that the center of gravity moves forward and aft the question is
Does the center of gravity moves up and down??
Lookin forward for a reply

Thx


Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums

You should start a new thread and make the question a bit more clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
16K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K