What is the 3D wave function and energy of an electron in an extended 1D well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgod88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d 3d
sgod88
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Quantum well structure can be realized by sandwiching layers of semiconductor and two insulators.
This sandwiching problem was often treated with 1 D infinite well. Suppose now the problem is 3 dimensional well with length L at z direction from 0 to L, at which

V(x,y,z)= 0 when 0<z<L
infinity otherwise
where V(x) and V(y) is 0. We assume x and y be infinitely large.

Wht is the total energy and the wave function of the electron in such well?
2. I have done the separation of varibales in the Schrodinger equation and obtained the three independent wavefunction.
-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\psi_{x_{i}}=E \psi_{x_{i}}
But i don't know what is the boundary condition of the x and y.
I only got psi(z) is the psi of the one d wavefunction.
\psi_{z}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n \pi z}{L})
I just cannot get the constant for the wavefunctions for x and y.
I know that
\psi(x)=\psi(x+2\pi)
but I still cannot get the value of the constant and the energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you assume periodic boundary conditions?

It is an infinite well. Remember, that means the wavefunction is zero at all boundaries of the well.
 
But now V(x,y,z)=V(z), where V is not a function of x and y anymore.
With this condition, in x and y, the wavefunction is certainly not zero, it is a free particle.
\psi_{x}=e^{i(kx-wt)}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top