What is the Absolute Maximum of a Function on a Bounded Region?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jegues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Maximum
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Find the maximum value of the function f(x, y) = xy(3 − x − 2y) on the triangle R bounded by the positive x- and y-axes and the line x+y = 1. Assume that f(x, y) has no critical points in the interior of R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for my attempt.

At the top of the page I have made a quick sketch of the triangle bounding the region R.

Since we are allowed to assume there are no critical points in R I proceeded to looking to the edges of the region for critical points.

I labeled them accordingly, C1, C2, C3.

On C1 we can see that x = 0 and it results in the function f(0,y) = 0.

To look for critical points on this edge we take the derivative and set it equal to 0 and solve.

Since 0 = 0 can I simply state that all the points on this edge are critical? This part confuses me.

The outcome is the same for C2 as well.

On C3 we can see that y=-x, resulsting in,

f(x,-x) = -x^{3} -3x^{2} = g(x)

I then took the derivative, factors and solved for the critical points which I found were at,

x=0,x=-2

When I plugged these values back into g(x) I obtained values of 0 and -4.

I don't really know what conclusion I can make without better classifying the edges C1 and C2, but as it stands right now I'd have to say that the absolute maximum occurs when Z=-4.

Can someone help clarify what I'm doing wrong or what I'm misunderstanding.

The answer listed is,

\frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{9}

Thanks again.
 

Attachments

  • AMQ.jpg
    AMQ.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 406
Physics news on Phys.org
jegues said:

Homework Statement



Find the maximum value of the function f(x, y) = xy(3 − x − 2y) on the triangle R bounded by the positive x- and y-axes and the line x+y = 1. Assume that f(x, y) has no critical points in the interior of R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for my attempt.

At the top of the page I have made a quick sketch of the triangle bounding the region R.

Since we are allowed to assume there are no critical points in R I proceeded to looking to the edges of the region for critical points.

I labeled them accordingly, C1, C2, C3.

On C1 we can see that x = 0 and it results in the function f(0,y) = 0.

To look for critical points on this edge we take the derivative and set it equal to 0 and solve.
Why bother taking the derivative? The function values are all zero along this edge.
jegues said:
Since 0 = 0 can I simply state that all the points on this edge are critical? This part confuses me.

The outcome is the same for C2 as well.

On C3 we can see that y=-x
No, on C3, y = 1 - x. This affects your subsequent work.
jegues said:
, resulsting in,

f(x,-x) = -x^{3} -3x^{2} = g(x)

I then took the derivative, factors and solved for the critical points which I found were at,

x=0,x=-2

When I plugged these values back into g(x) I obtained values of 0 and -4.

I don't really know what conclusion I can make without better classifying the edges C1 and C2, but as it stands right now I'd have to say that the absolute maximum occurs when Z=-4.

Can someone help clarify what I'm doing wrong or what I'm misunderstanding.

The answer listed is,

\frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{9}

Thanks again.
 
Thank you, I've got it now.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top