What is the acceleration of a rod in a rail gun?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the acceleration of the conducting rod in a rail gun setup, the discussion highlights the need to calculate the current (I) using Ohm's law, where I = V/R. The magnetic force acting on the rod can be derived from the equation F = I(L × B), where L is the length of the rod and B is the magnetic field strength. To find the acceleration, Newton's second law (F = ma) is applied. Additionally, it is suggested to incorporate Faraday's law by formulating a differential equation that accounts for the back electromotive force (emf) generated as the rod moves. This approach integrates the effects of voltage, magnetic field, resistance, and mass to derive the rod's acceleration.
matt747
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm trying to come up with an expression for the accleration of the rod in Rail Gun.

The conducting rod is free to slide on two parallel rails with negligible friction. At the right end of the rails, a voltage source of strength "V" in series with a resistor of resistance "R" makes a closed circuit together with the rails and the rod. The rails and the rod are taken to be perfect conductors. The rails extend to infinity on the left.

There is a uniform magnetic field of magnitude B, pervading all space, perpendicular to the plane of rod and rails. The rod is released from rest, and it is observed that it accelerates to the left.

I'm trying to find the acceleration based on the following variables:

V (voltage)
B (magnetic field)
v (velocity of the rod)
L (Length of the rod)
R (Resistance)
m (mass)

http://mp.pearsoncmg.com/probhtml/16467_a.jpg

Thanks,

Matt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the current ##I## in the rail using Ohm's law and then find the magnetic force on the rail using ##\vec F=I\vec L\times \vec B##. Finally, Newton's law will give you the acceleration. If you have seen Faraday's law, you need to write a differential equation taking the back emf into account.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top