What is the Acceleration of an Inclined Plane due to Recoiling Block?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a recoiling inclined plane due to a sliding block. The user derived the acceleration using a non-inertial reference frame and arrived at a negative value, which raised questions about the direction of acceleration. Responses clarified that the problem does not specify a preferred direction for acceleration, suggesting that the magnitude is what matters. It was noted that if the block's forward motion is considered positive, the negative result for the plane's acceleration is expected. Ultimately, the user was affirmed for correctly solving the problem despite the confusion over sign conventions.
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement


A block of mass m is on an inclined plane of mass M, inclined at angle θ, and slides on the plane without friction. Find the acceleration of the plane.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am using the usual cartesian coordinate system with no rotations and letting up and forward be the positive directions. Let A be the acceleration of the plane as it accelerates backwards from the recoil due to the moving block. Define a non - inertial reference frame that is co - moving with the plane. The equations of motion for the block in this frame are m\ddot{y} = Ncos\theta - mg,m\ddot{x} = F_{apparent} = Nsin\theta - mA and we have, in this co - moving frame, the constraint \ddot{y} = -tan\theta \ddot{x}. The equation of motion for the plane in this frame is 0 = F'_{apparent} = -Nsin\theta - MA. Combining the equations for the block we get that N = mgcos\theta + mAsin\theta so MA = -Nsin\theta = -mgcos\theta sin\theta - mAsin^{2}\theta therefore A = -(\frac{mgcos\theta sin\theta }{M + msin^{2}\theta }). The book has the same answer except it is positive. I'm not sure why mine is negative. They don't really list if they are taking the backwards direction to be positive or not so I don't know if that is all there is to the issue. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Isaac
There is nothing in the statement that would give you a preferred direction, I read it as finding the magnitude of the acceleration of the plane. Otherwise, since the acceleration is a vector in the end, you could as well wonder about which component is which.
So I don't think there is any issue at all, you solved the problem :)
 
Assuming you have exactly reproduced the statement of the problem from the book, I would guess you are supposed to take the positive direction as being whichever way the wedge moves. You say you let "up and forward be the positive directions", but you don't say forward for which object. If you meant forward for the block then you would expect a negative result for the wedge.
(Good job getting the right answer - easy to go wrong with a question like this.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top