What is the angular acceleration of the rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a vertical rod after a supporting cable breaks. Participants clarify the dimensions of the rod and emphasize the importance of interpreting the problem as occurring shortly after the cable breaks, rather than immediately. They discuss the need to account for the tension in the cable and the moment of inertia in their calculations. The final calculated angular acceleration values vary slightly among participants, with results around 1.95 to 2.12 rad/s². The conversation highlights the nuances in physics problems and the importance of precise calculations and assumptions.
Asad Raza
Messages
81
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A thin, uniform, 18.5 kg post, 2.10 m long, is held vertically using a cable and is attached to a 5.00 kg mass and a pivot at its bottom end (as shown below). The string attached to the 5.00 kg mass passes over a massless, frictionless pulley and pulls perpendicular to the post. Suddenly the cable breaks. Find the angular acceleration of the post about the pivot just after the cable breaks in rad/s2. Assume g=9.8m/s2[See the uploaded image for clarity]

Homework Equations



T=I(Alpha)
Anticlockwise= Clockwise Torque

The Attempt at a Solution


(Tension in cable) (2.14)=5x9.8x1.64
Torque=(Tension in cable)(2.14)
I=moment of inertia= 1/3 (16)(2.14)^2

I calculated the angular acceleration by dividing Torque by Moment of inertia as shown above. Unfortunately, the answer doesn't turn out to be correct. Help will be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_1.jpg
    Screenshot_1.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 929
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not assume that the tension in the cable equals the weight of the mass. (If it did, the mass wouldn't fall.)
 
Asad Raza said:
(Tension in cable) (2.14)=5x9.8x1.64

Asad Raza said:
2.10 m long
Is it 2.10 or 2.14?
 
Doc Al said:
Do not assume that the tension in the cable equals the weight of the mass. (If it did, the mass wouldn't fall.)
This is a bit tricky. The question should really say "shortly after the cable breaks".
The problem is that although we happily refer to inextensible strings (and massless pulleys, etc.), what we generally mean is that it is so near to inextensible that it does not materially affect the answer. In reality, all strings have some elasticity, but maybe with a very high spring constant.
Accepting that, it follows that the string will continue to exert the same tension until the pole has moved a bit, but that movement comes from its acceleration. Hence the acceleration of the suspended mass is irrelevant to the instantaneous acceleration of the pole.
 
haruspex said:
This is a bit tricky. The question should really say "shortly after the cable breaks".
I agree! This sort of sloppiness always bugs me. :smile:
 
haruspex said:
Is it 2.10 or 2.14?
Yeah sorry 2.1 is the length. Otherwise, is the working correct?
 
Asad Raza said:
Yeah sorry 2.1 is the length. Otherwise, is the working correct?
No.
As I mentioned, you need to interpret the question as "shortly" after the cable breaks, rather than immediately after. The distinction is subtle, as I described in post #4, but the consequence is that you need to assume that the string is not changing length at all. What does that mean regarding the acceleration of the suspended mass? Consider Doc Al's post #2.
 
Attempt it like this :

Edit :
I just realized that i have written

## \alpha (l2) = a ##

which is wrong instead it should be:

## \alpha (l2-l1) = a ##

but you get the idea

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2jHGkWhC0E2S1lxUEVwbDVab0E/view?usp=sharing
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Attempt it like this :

Edit :
I just realized that i have written

## \alpha (l2) = a ##

which is wrong instead it should be:

## \alpha (l2-l1) = a ##

but you get the idea

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2jHGkWhC0E2S1lxUEVwbDVab0E/view?usp=sharing
Yes, with the correction that's looking good. So what answer do you get?
 
  • #10
1.95 rad/s^2
 
  • #11
Ahh let me try
 
  • #12
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Attempt it like this :

Edit :
I just realized that i have written

## \alpha (l2) = a ##

which is wrong instead it should be:

## \alpha (l2-l1) = a ##

but you get the idea

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2jHGkWhC0E2S1lxUEVwbDVab0E/view?usp=sharing
Ah... Didn't notice that you are not the originator of the thread. Please do not post complete solutions like that, it is against forum rules.
 
  • #13
PumpkinCougar95 said:
1.95 rad/s^2
I'm getting 2.12. Wondering about whether this discrepancy is just an arithmetic error?
 
  • #14
Asad Raza said:
I'm getting 2.12. Wondering about whether this discrepancy is just an arithmetic error?
Please post all your working.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Ah... Didn't notice that you are not the originator of the thread. Please do not post complete solutions like that, it is against forum rules.

Sorry, Didn't know.
 
  • #16
PumpkinCougar95 said:
1.95 rad/s^2
Actually, I copied different values in the question. The answer with these values is 1.96 rad/s^2.

Thank you for help.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
Please post all your working.
Thank you. I understood the question.

Thank you again for help.
 
  • #18
Asad Raza said:
Actually, I copied different values in the question. The answer with these values is 1.96 rad/s^2.
That's what I get.
 
  • #19
Is that I(angular a)= (mg-ma)(2.10-0.5) ?
 
Back
Top