What is the Angular Dependence of Electron Scattering?

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
hi,
here's the problem:

imagine a heavy nucleus and an electron approaching it with some momentum pi.
it scatters elastically off the nucleus at some angle \theta and momentum pf. the nucleus can be considered to remain at rest, since it is so massive.

I have to start with the definition of vector q = pi - pf, get an expression for q^2 (the square of the magnitude of the vector q), and show that the angular dependence of the scattering is given by the Rutherford formula,

\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \propto 1/(sin^4(\theta/2))<br />

my attempted solution:

so far I've worked out that q2 = (pi - pf)2 = pi2 - pf2 - 2pi.pf
ie. q2 = 2p2 - 2p2cos(\theta)
= 2p2(1-cos(\theta))
since the magnitudes of pi and pf are equal.

then I got 1 - cos(\theta) = 2sin2(\theta/2)
by using cos(A+B) = cos(A)cos(B) - sin(A)sin(B) where A = B = \theta/2

then I looked at Fermi's Golden Rule:

\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = (2\pi/\hbar)|Mfi|2Df

where the matrix element |Mfi| = \frac{4g^2\pi\hbar}{q^2 + (mc)^2}
which is a result that is given to me in a previous part of the problem.

clearly when used in Fermi's Golden Rule, the square of the matrix element gives 3 terms, one of which is the 1/q4 term I am looking for, but also 2 other terms. Is there a way for me to get rid of the 2 extra terms or am I barking up the wrong tree here?

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually, ignore this question, i figured it out. the mass m = 0. I'm an idiot. can't even find a way to delete the question.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top