What is the angular frequency of oscillations in a SHM system with weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter applestrudle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm Weight
applestrudle
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass hanging on a spring is oscillating with SHM. The initial displacement due to gravity is 0.1m By considering the forces acting on the mass at equilibrium, calculate the angular frequency of the oscillations.

Homework Equations



\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} + {w}^{2}x = g

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the integrating factor method to get

x = \frac{m}{kg} (1-{e}^{-kt/m} -0.1{e}^{-kt/m}

I'm not really sure where to go from there

I always get stuck on questions when they have weight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okay dw i got it now, 9.9 s-1 you just equate the forces at equilibrium with x = 0.1
 
$$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} + {w}^{2}x = g$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the integrating factor method to get

$$ x = \frac{m}{kg} (1-{e}^{-kt/m} -0.1{e}^{-kt/m}) $$

I'm not really sure where to go from there
... I think you are getting ahead of yourself.
The weight adds an extra force into your free-body diagram.

If you have positive displacements downwards, measured from the unstretched length position,
then ##-ky+mg=m\ddot y## (you don't need to solve it!)
... divide through by m gets the same relation you have - see what ##\omega^2## is equal to?

You don't know k or m.
But you do know what the equilibrium displacement is
- what is special about the forces at equilibrium?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top