What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round now?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new angular velocity of a merry-go-round after four people step onto it. Initially, the merry-go-round has a diameter of 4.3 m and an angular velocity of 0.78 rad/s, with a moment of inertia of 1760 kg m^2. After the people step on, the calculated new angular velocity is 0.46 rad/s. For the second scenario, where the people jump off, the initial angular velocity should be updated to 0.46 rad/s, which affects the calculations. The confusion in the second part was clarified by recognizing the need to use the updated angular velocity from the first scenario.
AlvinC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.3 m diameter merry-go-round is rotating freely with an angular velocity of 0.78 rad/s. Its total moment of inertia is 1760 kg m^2. Four people standing on the ground, each of mass 67 kg, suddenly step onto the edge of the merry-go-round.

1)What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round now?

2)What if the people were on it initially and then jumped off in a radial direction (relative to the merry-go-round)?

Homework Equations



I_i*w_i=I_f*w_f

w_f=(I_i/I_f)*w_i

The Attempt at a Solution



For question 1 I plugged the numbers in and got 0.46 rad/s.
w_f=(1760/(1760+4*67*2.15^2)*.78 =0.46 rad/s

For question 2 since the people were on it initially i made I_f in my previous question to I_i and I_i to I_f. So it looked something like this:
w_f=(2998.83/1760)*.78 = 1.3 rad/s which was wrong. Not sure what I did wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AlvinC said:
For question 2 since the people were on it initially i made I_f in my previous question to I_i and I_i to I_f. So it looked something like this:
w_f=(2998.83/1760)*.78 = 1.3 rad/s which was wrong. Not sure what I did wrong.

i also get same answer

you sure that wi in second case is .78 and not .56 like we found in second case ?
 
Oh yess! I forgot to make .46 as my new initial angular velocity. Much Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top