What is the appropriate gain for the MCA amplifier in this scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dagg3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplifier Gain
dagg3r
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
:mad: A radioactive material emits 2 gamma rays with 2 energies 50 keV and 200 keV with equal probabilities the detector system has a quantum efficiency of 100% and 50% respectively at these 2 energies and the pulse heights are 1.0 mV and 4.0mV respectively. The pulses are input into a 512 channel, 10 V lfull scale, MCA. The total system has an energy resolution of 20 keV.

Suggest an appropriate gain of the MCA amplifier


i sketched the displayed spectrum... also looking at the solutions they somehow got a gain of 2*10^3 with the pulse height of 4.0 mV at a channel 409 corrresponding to 8 V.

any ideas how htey got that gain and the channel number corresponding to the pulse height?

i tried fiddling round with the formulas given of
energy resolution = (FWHM / pulse height at centre of peak) * 100%
no luck.. somehow they got a gain of 2*10^3 for a plot that is num of counts vs channel number...

hope you guys know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why the gain chosen shouldn't just follow from the largest detected signal (4mV) and the FS value (10V). Since the MCA gain on a spectrometer is usually selected on a dial, you have a limited number of options. A gain of 2000X will amplify a 4mV signal to 8V (80% of FS). A higher gain setting (like 4000X or 5000X) would take the high energy peak off-scale.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top