What is the appropriate sample rate for measuring solar radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the appropriate sample rate for measuring solar radiation using a homemade pyranometer. A sample rate of 60 seconds has yielded good results, avoiding repetitive data that occurs at shorter intervals. The Nyquist theorem suggests a sampling frequency should be at least twice the frequency of the wave being studied, but solar radiation lacks a specific frequency due to its variability influenced by clouds and shadows. It is suggested that a one-minute interval is suitable for capturing changes in solar radiation without interference from short-term obstructions. Overall, a 60-second sample rate appears effective for this application.
tinvicemp06
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a solar radiation project. I was able to design a homemade pyranometer, yet I'm trying to establish what the sample rate should be.

After reading several pdfs I set 60 seconds as my sample rate and I have good results, I mean if I choose 10 seconds instead I just get a lot of the same results, but with 60 I'm not getting repetitive results and it's small enough to provide with information about how the parameter behaves.

I was recommended to find a theory that will support my choice, I was looking at the Nyquist theorem and it says that I should have a sampling frequency at least twice as big as the frequency of the wave I'm trying to study. The question is what's the frequency of the wave I'm trying to study?

Is it fair to say that my sampling frequency is 1/60 Hz ?

I'm pretty lost here. Thanks in advance for any guidance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The solar radiation itself doesn't have a frequency in that sense. It will vary based on clouds and other shadows. You could measure their frequency spectrum, I guess. If there is nothing that provides shadow on a short timescale (people walking by or whatever) and a minute works well for clouds that should be fine.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top