What is the average force required to pull the rope?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ski tow system, where participants are tasked with determining the average force required to pull a rope that transports skiers up a slope. The problem includes parameters such as the speed of the rope, the angle of the slope, and the mass of the skiers.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods to calculate the average force, including impulse and energy considerations. Some question the complexity of using a floor function to determine the number of skiers on the tow, while others suggest focusing on average values instead.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations regarding the average number of skiers and the force calculations. Some participants have provided alternative approaches and questioned assumptions, while others express confusion about the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding steady flow conditions and the implications of skier density on the calculations. There is also mention of potential errors in calculations due to misunderstanding units or assumptions about the system's behavior.

  • #31
So now that you have the solution, I would suggest going back to probably the sanest and most straightforward post in this thread:

haruspex said:
An alternative approach is to look at the energy given to each skier (PE+KE), deduce the power, and hence the force.

Consider two points in time which are 5 s apart. What is going to be the difference between the two times when it comes to the tow system?
What average force is necessary to accomplish this change in energy in 5 s for a system that is moving with 1.5 m/s (i.e., a system that has moved 7.5 m)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
:) I don't have any knowledge about energy yet, it's too early !
 
  • #33
One last question about the meaning of average force in this context.
The definition of average force in my book is ## \vec F_{av}\triangle t = \int_t^{t+\triangle t} \vec F(s) ds ##

However, it is not straightforward here, because you get different results depending of the state of your system when you start watching it.

To me, a suitable way is to first average over all observable systems first, and then average force as usual:

I mean that in one third of the possible configurations we get
##\int_{0}^{t_f} T dt = 14 mv + 3128 t_f ##

And in two third of possible configurations we get
##\int_{0}^{t_f} T dt = 13 mv + 3128 t_f ##

So first step is to average over all configurations, so you multiply first equation by 1/3, second equation by 2/3, and you add them.

Then you average force as usual, which gives
##T_{av} =\frac{1}{t_f}( \frac{40}{3} mv + 3128 t_f ) = \frac{3}{200} ( \frac{40}{3} \times 70 \times \frac{3}{2} +\frac{200}{3} 3128 ) = 21 + 3128 = 3149 N ##

That would work don't you think?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Geoff, there really is no need to consider purely hypothetical configurations and then average. The averaging has been done for you beforehand: the 5 seconds itself is an average. Could well be that this is a day average and that during lunchtime there were hardly any skiers on the tow.
 
  • #35
geoffrey159 said:
One last question about the meaning of average force in this context.
The definition of average force in my book is ## \vec F_{av}\triangle t = \int_t^{t+\triangle t} \vec F(s) ds #
That's the average over a specific time interval ##(t, t+\Delta t)##. You are not given such a time interval here, so the appropriate interpretation is the average over an arbitrarily long time. This makes the little variations over each 5 second interval irrelevant.
 
  • #36
There are way too many averages in this problem, it goes beyond my understanding.
Many thanks for your help Haruspex, Orodruin, Bvu , I think you've done everything possible to make me understand, but it is not possible.
I give up for now, maybe once I know energy I'll have another perspective on this problem. Thanks again!
 
  • #37
geoffrey159 said:
There are way too many averages in this problem, it goes beyond my understanding.
Many thanks for your help Haruspex, Orodruin, Bvu , I think you've done everything possible to make me understand, but it is not possible.
I give up for now, maybe once I know energy I'll have another perspective on this problem. Thanks again!
I think for half marks you should just work out the force needed to transport the string of skiers up the slope, neglecting the extra force involved in initially bringing each up to speed. The problem neatly breaks apart into two parts, so if you complete one you should be eligible for half the marks.
Good luck with your studies! http://thumbnails112.imagebam.com/37333/0363e9373324851.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K