What is the best way to begin studying Nuclear Fusion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a high school junior's interest in nuclear fusion and the challenges of finding a starting point for study. Key suggestions include exploring the ITER project and focusing on superconductors, particularly Nb3Sn, and understanding BCS theory. Emphasis is placed on the importance of mathematics, with recommendations to study calculus, classical mechanics, and electromagnetism as foundational subjects. Participants highlight the need for a qualitative understanding of complex topics before delving into advanced physics, suggesting that even basic resources like Wikipedia can provide valuable insights. The conversation underscores the necessity of a solid mathematical background while seeking more focused areas within the broader field of nuclear physics.
black phantom
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am a junior in high school, and for the past few years nuclear physics has caught my attention. Mainly Nuclear Fusion. I have done some reading on the subject and I have looked around but I am having some difficulties finding what exactly I should start with studying first. Nuclear Fusion is kind of a broad subject. I have come across Quantum physics, all sorts of nuclear physics and chemistry leads, and they are all interesting, but I don't know where to start. And I mean aside from taking all the math and science classes I can in high school. A nudge or a kick in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, i assume you've seen this site talking about the ITER project:

http://www.iter.org/

I did a quick Web of Science search (you prob don't have access to this in high school, or maybe you do some schools have good resources these days) and there are a lot of high-end physics and materials science papers.

Look at super conductors, particularly Nb3Sn which is fabricated in Japan. Try and get your head around BCS (bardeen cooper schrieffer) theory - good luck as it eludes most. Look at difference between Type I and Type II super conductors. This is really interesting and it seems to be key to the project (I say this having spend 15 minutes trawling paper titles).

But, I'm studying materials science so Superconductors are kind of like porn to me. Some physicists here may have other ideas.

Also MATHS IS KING and let no one tell you otherwise. You can never take too much maths at high school.
 
streeters said:
Firstly, i assume you've seen this site talking about the ITER project:

http://www.iter.org/

I did a quick Web of Science search (you prob don't have access to this in high school, or maybe you do some schools have good resources these days) and there are a lot of high-end physics and materials science papers.

Look at super conductors, particularly Nb3Sn which is fabricated in Japan. Try and get your head around BCS (bardeen cooper schrieffer) theory - good luck as it eludes most. Look at difference between Type I and Type II super conductors. This is really interesting and it seems to be key to the project (I say this having spend 15 minutes trawling paper titles).

But, I'm studying materials science so Superconductors are kind of like porn to me. Some physicists here may have other ideas.

Also MATHS IS KING and let no one tell you otherwise. You can never take too much maths at high school.

I can't tell if you're being serious or not. Are you asking him to understand BCS theory? Yes, because that's a standard approach. Before learning calculus and introductory physics one should learn graduate condensed matter physics...If you want to learn about nuclear fusion technically then learn the pre-requisites.

- Calculus
- Mechanics (classical and quantum)
- Electromagnetism

These are all undergraduate courses and you'll have to wait to better understand nuclear fusion in the meantime you'll have to rely on the less technical information.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
I can't tell if you're being serious or not. Are you asking him to understand BCS theory?

Yeah, why not? I'm talking about qualitative not quantitative understanding. Even reading the wikipedia entry on it will help him/her understand or give him/her somewhere to start looking (which I think he was after). Telling him/her to just "do calculus" isn't what he/she wanted. God I hate gender-neutral handles.
 
Thank you, I did find what you, streeters, posted about iter to be interesting, and what I was looking for was more of the qualitative nature, because I know I need to study math and all kinds of sciences. I guess I was looking for more of a narrower subject to start with than nuclear physics, quantum mechanics, or broad subjects like that. But thank you. And it's "he".
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top