What is the best way to reduce radiation exposure in a hospital laboratory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylor.simon
  • Start date Start date
taylor.simon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

a gamma raidiation source (226Ra) is used in hospital laboratory. if shielding is considered as a means of control how many centimeters are needed to reduce the radiation to 1% of what a worker would be exposed to without shielding? assume the shield material is a) concrete B)lead C) steel note the half thicknesses are 0.12m, 0.014m ,0.018m respectively

part 2
as an alternative to shielding of the radiation source in the above question is to extend the distance between the radiation and the worker if the initial design placed the worker at 1m and then the design was review and place the source 10m what percentage reduction in radiation exposure would there for the second position relative to the first

2. Homework Equations

part 1 n=-2/log1/2
part 1 df/di = (ri/rf)^2 ri=1m rf=10m
3. The Attempt at a Solution

i have no idea how to do ether i asked the lecturer and he said there was a way without have to do logarithms for the first part but didn't explain how and i need to know how for my exams please and help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, i have a similar problem and the best I've come up with so far is the inverse square law, ie at 1m dose rate constant, at 2m the dose rate is the square of the distance thus at 3m equals 9m2 etc then the HVL of the shielding material is calculated by thickness required to absorb half of the remaining dose.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top