What is the Bungee Jumper's Speed at a Height of 12.5 m Above the Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Uncle6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bungee Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a bungee jumper at a height of 12.5 meters above water, using conservation of energy principles. The jumper, weighing 64.5 kg, falls from a platform 48 meters high with a bungee cord that stretches 10.1 meters. Key calculations involve determining the potential energy lost during the fall and the energy stored in the bungee cord as it stretches. The jumper's kinetic energy at 12.5 meters is derived from the difference between gravitational potential energy and the elastic potential energy of the stretched cord. The final calculated speed at this height is approximately 6.37 m/s, highlighting the interplay between gravitational and elastic forces during the jump.
Uncle6
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A bungee jumper of mass 64.5 kg ( including safety gear) is standing on a platform 48.0 m above a river. The length of the unstretched bungee cord is 10.1 m. The force constant of the cord is 65.5 N/m. The jumper falls from rest and just touches the water at a speed of zero. The cord acts like an ideal spring. Use conservation of energy to determine the jumper's speed at a height of 12.5 m above the water on the first fall."

m=64.5 kg
fconstant= 65.5 N/m
dT=48.0m
v3=0 m/s
unstreched bungee cord = 10.1 m
y2 = 12.5m
RTF = v2

Homework Equations


W=0
Et1=Et2

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a diagram first of total distance 48.0 m. There is 10.1 down from the top and 12.5 m up from the bottom.
I make x1 the distance that remains
So: x1 = 48.0-10.1-12.5 = 37.9m
x2= x1+12.5 = 25.4

0 = ΔEg+ΔEk+ΔEe
(Rearrange)
v2 = sqrt(2(mgΔy+1/2m(vsub3)^2+1/2k(xsub2)^2 -1/2k(xsub1)^2)/m)
(at bottom, the velocity(vsub3) is 0, I plug in #s)
= 23.6 m/s (books says 6.37 m/s)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've almost got it. I get 6.3748 m/s.

The Difference in Potential Energy of gravity minus what gets stored in the cord is what's available for KE.

The 35.5m drop to the 12.m mark is 22,439.55 J.
The PE of the cord is 21,128.99 J
the difference is 1310.56 J which is the KE of the jumper at that point.

Check the signs of your equation.
 
Uncle6 said:
"A bungee jumper of mass 64.5 kg ( including safety gear) is standing on a platform 48.0 m above a river. The length of the unstretched bungee cord is 10.1 m. The force constant of the cord is 65.5 N/m. The jumper falls from rest and just touches the water at a speed of zero.
Something doesn't seem right about these numbers (or maybe I just need more coffee?). Compare the decrease in gravitational PE when the jumper falls 48 m to the increase in spring PE when he just touches the water (how much has the cord stretched?).
 
Im still having trouble with this question. I don't understand the Elastic Pot Energy. Could explain to me the heights you used and why.

I don't understand how to get 35.5 m
 
Uncle6 said:
Im still having trouble with this question. I don't understand the Elastic Pot Energy. Could explain to me the heights you used and why.

I don't understand how to get 35.5 m

You start at 48 m.

They want his velocity at 12.5 m. 48 - 12.5 = 35.5 m. That's how much potential energy has been converted from gravity.

Now if there was no bungee attached to his feet he'd be trucking pretty darn quickly toward impact. But that's where the bungee enters. After he has had the enjoyment of 10.1 m of free fall he reaches the relaxed length of his bungee. Now comes the retarding effect. As he drops lower and lower the bungee gets stretched and as it gets stretched that kinetic energy that he was gaining on the way down gets drained away starting at 10.1 m.

Happily they say the bungee will save him before impact. But at the point of interest 12.5 m he still has kinetic energy and hence velocity.

So ... what he has then is the potential energy of the drop to that point propelling him still less what the bungee has been robbing away as it stretches to that point (what went into spring potential energy).

Hence m*g*h -1/2kx2 = 1/2*m*v2

h is the fall to that point. x is how far it's stretched since he passed 10.1m.
 
K, got it thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top