What is the change of variables for Lennard-Jones potential?

Lavace
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/4287/len2.jpg

Homework Equations


[PLAIN]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2428/len1y.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


I know my way around the Lennard-Jones potential formula, but this question stumps me.

Any clues on how to proceed are greatly thanked!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just define a new unitless variable as X=r/\sigma.
 
nickjer said:
Just define a new unitless variable as X=r/\sigma.


I used your defined variable and plugged it in, but still cannot arrive at the proof given in the question, could you possibly expand further?

Thank you!
 
I wouldn't call that a proof. You are just doing a change of variables. You can replace r/\sigma with X in the above equation. Unless 'X' has a meaning that I am unaware of.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top