What is the charge on the other sphere after adding electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter red ink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charge on two spheres after transferring electrons to create an attractive force. The user initially calculated the charge on one sphere as 8.43*10^-2 and determined that 5.268*10^17 electrons would need to be transferred. They expressed the charge on the second sphere as q_2 = (q_1 - 5.268*10^17), but were informed they were off by an additive constant. The correct relationship is that the charges must be equal and opposite, leading to q_2 being -5.268*10^17 if q_1 is 5.268*10^17. The user seeks clarification on whether any constants are necessary in their final answer.
red ink
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Im doing some online homework and it says my answer is off by an additive constant?
Some back ground...
How many electrons would have to be removed from one sphere and added to the other to cause an attractive force between the spheres of magnitude 1.00 *10^4 Newtons? Assume that the spheres may be treated as point charges.

I caluclated the charge in one sphere to be 8.43*10^-2. Then calculated how many electrons are needed to get this charge which is 5.268*10^17.

Assume that after some electrons have been removed from it, the first sphere ends up with a net charge of q_1. What would be the charge on the other sphere, q_2, after these extra electrons are added to it?

I entered q_2=(q_1 - 5.268*10^17). It says I am off by an additive constant? Did i lose you guys, or do u know what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means you're off by some number that can be added or subtracted from your answer
 
red ink said:
I entered q_2=(q_1 - 5.268*10^17). It says I am off by an additive constant? Did i lose you guys, or do u know what's wrong?

Where'd you get this from? Doesn't make any sense to me.

Hint: If you take 3 electrons off one sphere and slap them onto the other, then obviously suddenly there's a net charge of +3e on the first sphere, and since the second one gets the three extra electrons the first one lost, its net charge is obviously then -3e. Can you see that since you're just transferring charge from one sphere to the other, the net charge on one sphere has to be equal and opposite to that on the other?
 
assuming this is the correct number of electrons needed , 5.268*10^17 ,to create the force, what would q_2 be then?
I totally understand the concept u mentioned, but the online program said i have to have q_1 in my answer to what q_2 equals
E.g.
q_2= q_1 ?
what goes in place of the question marks? rrrr...online homework sucks
 
red ink said:
q_2= q_1 ?

Close. Equal and OPPOSITE.
 
if q_1= 5.268*10^17
then q_2= -5.268*10^17
are there any nessesary constants i need to express in my answer?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top