What is the commutator of position and momentum squared in quantum mechanics?

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement



Calculate [\hat X, \hat P^2].

Homework Equations


[\hat A, \hat B] \Psi =[\hat A \hat B - \hat B \hat A ] \Psi.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused by P^2.
P is worth -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}.
So I believe P^2= \hbar ^2 \left ( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right ) ^2.
If so, I get that [\hat X, \hat P^2]= \hbar ^2 \left [ x \left ( \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right ) ^2 -\Psi ^2 - 2x \Psi \frac {\partial \Psi}{\partial x} - x^2 \left ( \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right )^2 \right ].
However if by \hat P ^2 they mean \hbar ^2 \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}, then I get [\hat X, \hat P^2]=-2 \hbar ^2 \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}.
I think my first approach was correct, but the answer I get seems way too complicated. I would like a feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should the the latter.

<br /> \hbar ^2 \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}<br />

The Hamiltonian is often defined with the "P^2" operator.

While not all that physically meaningful, it's interesting to see what P^3 gives... (and so on)
 
Last edited:
Oh, thank you. I wasn't aware of that.
I'd like to know if I got a logical result, if it's not too much asked. :smile:
In all cases I'll redo the algebra tomorrow.
 
Oh yeah, the result is correct, and I guess see my edit that just made if you are curious.
 
Or you could change to impulse representation where the momentum operator acts on \psi (k) the same as the position operator acts on \psi (x) in coordinate representation :) That way you need not mess with derivatives.

But in the end you get the same result ;) So I guess it's the matter of which way is easier to you...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top