What is the concentration of Br1- ions in a solution of 0.0330% AlBr3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration Ion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the concentration of Br1- ions in a 0.0330% AlBr3 solution. Participants clarify that the percentage indicates grams of AlBr3 per 100 mL of solution, leading to a conversion into moles. The correct approach involves determining the number of moles of Br1- ions based on the molar mass of AlBr3 and then converting this to concentration in ppm. There is an emphasis on maintaining significant figures throughout the calculations. The final concentration should be expressed in terms of moles per liter for accurate ppm conversion.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solution is found to be 0.0330% by weight AlBr3. What is the concentration of the Br1- ion expressed in ppm?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume .0330 % => .0330 g AlBr3

.0330 g AlBr3*(1 mol AlBr3/266.697 g AlBr3)*(3 mol Br^-1 /1 mol AlBr3) =.0003712 mol Br^-1

10^6 g sol'n *(1 mL/1.0 g sol'n)*(1 L/1000^3) = 1000 L

(.0003712 mol Br^-1) /(1000 L) = 3.712*10^-6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start over.

The percent of AlBr3 is grams per 100 grams of solution. You need to make an assumption that this low concentration (0.0330%) will yield a solution with a density of approximately 1.00 g/mL. (so 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.0330 g AlBr3/100 mL)

Since the concentration is given with a specific number of significant digits, use the same number of significant digits in your answer.
 
chemisttree said:
Start over.

The percent of AlBr3 is grams per 100 grams of solution. You need to make an assumption that this low concentration (0.0330%) will yield a solution with a density of approximately 1.00 g/mL. (so 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.0330 g AlBr3/100 mL)

Since the concentration is given with a specific number of significant digits, use the same number of significant digits in your answer.

don't you mean 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.00330 g/100 mL
AlBr3 not 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.0330/100 mL g AlBr3

Anywh, would you now multily (.00330 g AlBr3/100 g AlBr3)*(1 mol AlBr3 /266.68 g AlBr3)*(3 mol Br1-/1 mol AlBr3) to get the number of moles of Br1- ions? If I followed the correct procedure, would divide my number of bromine moles by 10^6 g to calculate the concentration?
 
Benzoate said:
don't you mean 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.00330 g/100 mL AlBr3 not 0.00330 g AlBr3/100g solution = 0.0330/100 mL g AlBr3

No. I mean 0.0330 g aluminum bromide per one hundred milliters of solution. In shorthand it looks like this: 0.0330 g AlBr3/100 mL solution.

Benzoate said:
Anywh, would you now multily (.00330 g AlBr3/100 g AlBr3)*(1 mol AlBr3 /266.68 g AlBr3)*(3 mol Br1-/1 mol AlBr3) to get the number of moles of Br1- ions? If I followed the correct procedure, would divide my number of bromine moles by 10^6 g to calculate the concentration?

Nope. If there are 0.0330 g AlBr3 per 100 mL of solution, how many grams of AlBr3 will there be in a liter? You need to express the number of moles of Br- in terms of moles per liter and then multiply by 10^6. You need to do a little work to convert percent to moles per liter... but you must do it. Try multiplying the percentage by ten and see where that leads. (since 10 X 100 mL is 1000 mL or one liter)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top