What Is the Concept of Superposition in Quantum Mechanics?

hellomister
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi I was just wondering if someone could explain superposition in QM? Is it to get the probability of finding a particle in a certain state of a wavefunction that would have both positive and negative probabilities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellomister said:
Hi I was just wondering if someone could explain superposition in QM? Is it to get the probability of finding a particle in a certain state of a wavefunction that would have both positive and negative probabilities?

Whoa! You can never have a negative probability! By definition, probability has a range of 0 to 1! You can never go past either limit!

Superposition is just the idea that if you have two or more functions acting on something, then the net effect is just the sum of the two functions separately:

<br /> F(x_1+x_2+\cdots)=F(x_1)+F(x_2)+\cdots<br />

In QM, if you have two separate wavefunctions that satisfy Schrodinger's equation, say \psi_1 and \psi_2, then you can create a third wavefunction by adding the two previous together:

<br /> \psi_3(x)=\alpha\psi_1(x)+\beta\psi_2(x)<br />

where I have used \alpha,\,\beta to be just constants that would need to be found in the process of solving the problem(s). The main reason one would want to do this is if \psi_3 has a basis that is more applicable to the situation (cases of spin, angular momentum)

Does this help any?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top