What is the correct expression for the entropy of a gas with a potential wall?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


See the attached picture


Homework Equations


The equations given should be the relevant ones.


The Attempt at a Solution


I feel I got a bad intuition and understanding of this problem. I could eliminate T in favor of S and then express x and T by U and S. Is this how its supposed to be done? I don't think so, because I wonna use the information that the wall slides without friction at some point. Anyone have an idea what to do?
Also I don't agree with the expression for the entropy given. If you do a phase space integral to find the partition function you have to integrate over the walls position too, so you end up with an expression where T is not just raised to the power of 3N/2 but more (after all the 3N/2 is just an ideal gas in a container with fixed walls). Don't YOU agree on this?
 

Attachments

  • Gas.png
    Gas.png
    30.6 KB · Views: 475
Physics news on Phys.org
The information about the wall's position is contained in the volume in the equation for the entropy. That is, the volume of the gas will be the surface area of the wall times a linear length which contains the variable x. Your attachment doesn't specify what x is measured relative to, so I can't say for certain what that length scale is.

So, your equation for entropy seems like it should be fine, or at least approximately fine. Now you just need to use it to determine the equilibrium condition.

To do that, note that your problem states that system is isolated and the energy, U, is known. So, it sounds like the energy isn't changing, is that correct? If so, your equation for U then relates the temperature to the wall's position.
 
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
aaaa202 said:
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.

If ##x## is the distance from the leftmost edge of the box to the movable wall, then the volume of the gas should just be ##V = Ax##, where A is the surface area of the movable wall. Then, the formula you are given would be ##S \sim N \ln(x T^{3/2})##. If that's the equation the problem gives you, you can just work with it by assumption to derive the final answer.

I don't have time to try and work out the partition function myself, so I can't really answer whether or not the factor ##\exp(-x^2/T)## that you calculate is correct or if gets canceled out by something, etc.

If U is not fixed, then I would guess that you need to use both the second law and the fact that the system will likely try to minimize its energy. By minimizing the energy, you could find a relation between x and T that you could insert into ##S##, which you could then maximize to find the final temperature and position.

You should post your calculation of the partition function. Perhaps someone else here will have time to go through it with you and see if they agree that the entropy expression given by the problem does not sufficiently describe the system.
 
Here is my calculation of the partition function. The crucial point is that I sum over all positions of the wall (we might as well extend the integral to infinity) and multiply it by all states of each atom. I should think that is combinatorically correct, but its probably wrong.
 

Attachments

  • partition func.png
    partition func.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 454
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top