What is the Correct Form of the Free Propagator in QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phymath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagator Qft
Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



from Zee QFT in a nutshell

the free propagator between two "sources" on the field is given byD(x_\mu) = -i \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3 2 \omega_k}[e^{-i(\omega_kt-k\bullet x)} \Theta(x_0) + e^{i(\omega_k t-k\bullet x)} \Theta(-x_0)

for a space like separation (x_0 = 0) Zee gets

<br /> -i\int\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3 2 \omega_k}e^{-i k\bullet x}<br />

with assumption that \Theta(0) = 1/2

with that assumption i don't agree with Zee i get

<br /> -i\int\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3 2 \omega_k}cos(k \bullet x)<br />

where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two expressions are equal. If you write the complex exponential as a sum of a sine and cosine, the sine term will integrate to zero because it is odd in k.
 
In the same book, in this definition of the D(x). Why do we get a term exp^-i(ωt-kx) when X_o in positive and a term exp^i(ωt-kx) when X_o is negative?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top