What Is the Correct Mass of Water When Hot Copper Meets Cold Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hot Metal Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of water when a hot copper sample is placed in it, using the principle of heat transfer. The user initially applies the heat transfer equation but arrives at an incorrect mass of water, leading to frustration. They suspect issues with significant figures or numerical calculations, as they consistently get a different answer. Another participant suggests that the correct mass should be around 90.59 g, indicating potential errors in the user's calculations. The conversation highlights the common challenges faced in thermodynamics problems and the importance of careful numerical analysis.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
hot metal + water = Tf?

Yet again I find i am stumped by having no clue as to what I did in this incredibly easy problem.

A 110.-g sample of copper (specific heat capacity = 0.20 J/ºC•g) is heated to 82.4 ºC and then placed in a container of water at 22.3 ºC. The final temperature of the water and copper is 25.6 ºC. What is the mass of the water in the container, assuming that all heat lost by the copper is gained by the water?

Simple right?

1 = water
2 = copper

m1c1 delta T1 = -m2c2 delta T2

This simplifies to...

m1= (-m2c2 delta T2)/(c1 delta T1)

which is...

(-(110*.2*(25.6-82.4)))/((4.18*(25.6-22.3)) = 95.8533g

Computer says I'm wrong and it slapped me

I then did the lazy way and calculated the energy required to lower the copper's temperature. With that, I manually figured out how much water there was and got the exact same answer.

Where am I going wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Significant digits? I don't know... :confused:
 
Did you do your numerical calculation right? Isn't the answer 90.59 g?
 
I tried 3 and 4 sig. figures with +/- 1 each direction and nothings coming out correctly. God i want to pound the writers of this textbook.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top