What is the definition of center of mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and conceptual understanding of the center of mass, exploring its implications in various contexts such as rigid bodies, gravitational fields, and mass distribution. Participants are examining how to articulate the concept clearly, particularly in relation to mass distribution and its effects on torque.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the center of mass as the balancing point of a body where mass is "evenly distributed," questioning how to better articulate this idea.
  • Another participant argues that the center of mass does not depend on even mass distribution, suggesting that it can apply to irregular bodies as well.
  • A participant provides an example using a long, thin rod, stating that if divided at its center of mass, each piece would have the same mass, but questions how this applies to three-dimensional objects.
  • Further discussion reveals that dividing a rod at its center of mass may result in unequal masses if the rod is not uniform, challenging the notion of even distribution.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the distribution should ensure zero net torque about the center of mass, equating this to the mass-weighted average position of mass elements.
  • One participant introduces a hypothetical particle concept, suggesting that when external forces are zero, it can represent an inertial frame, which they find useful in problem-solving involving the center of mass frame.
  • A formal mathematical expression for the center of mass is presented, indicating the integration of mass elements over their positions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of mass distribution for the center of mass, with no consensus reached on a singular definition or understanding. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to describe the concept.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their definitions, particularly concerning the assumptions about mass distribution and the implications for different shapes and configurations of objects.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I am trying to describe the concept of center of mass, and need some help with particulars:

The center of mass can be thought of the balancing point of a body; it is the point where mass is "evenly distributed" with respect to this point, such that if you were to place the body in a gravitational field and balance on its COM, then the gravitational force acting on each constituent mass would all cancel each and not produce a torque.

The idea I am having most difficulty reconciling is the idea that the mass is "evenly distributed." What is a better description for this, but keeps the same general idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Center of mass does not (cannot) depend on even mass distribution since if it did ONLY very regular bodies could have a center of mass, which is silly.

I don't know how to describe it formally, but here's how I think of it. If the body in question is assumed to be rigid (and if it isn't, you can get a shifting center of mass), AND you could magically attach something to the center of mass (that magically moves freely OTHER than being attached to the center of mass), then there is no orientation such that the body hanging from the connection to the center of mass would, in a uniform gravitational field, shift from that orientation due to gravity.
 
I guess what I mean by evenly distributed is this: suppose we have a long, thin rod; if you were to divide the rod at its center of mass, each piece of the rod would have the same mass. This idea works for two dimensional objects, I am having difficulty extending it to three dimensional objects.
 
Bashyboy said:
I guess what I mean by evenly distributed is this: suppose we have a long, thin rod; if you were to divide the rod at its center of mass, each piece of the rod would have the same mass.
That's true for a uniform rod. What about two unequal balls connected by a thin rod?
 
Hmm, if you were to divide the thing rod at its center of mass, each piece would be unequal in mass.
 
Bashyboy said:
Hmm, if you were to divide the thing rod at its center of mass, each piece would be unequal in mass.
Right. So thinking the mass would be "evenly distributed" won't work.

As you already pointed out, you want the distribution such that the net torque about the COM is zero. That's equivalent to saying that the mass-weighted average position of the mass elements would be at the COM.
 
A hypothetical particle that when the sum of the external forces on the system is zero will constitute an inertial frame (will travel in a straight line with respect to a lab frame or be at rest for all time with respect to a lab frame). This is the intuitive notion of the center of mass that I have personally found the most useful when solving problems in which the center of mass frame becomes invaluable e.g. two body problems interacting under some potential.

Formally it is simply ##R = \frac{1}{\int dm}\int rdm##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
10K