What is the Density of Conduction Electrons in Monovalent Copper?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of conduction electrons in monovalent copper is calculated to be approximately 8.4375 x 1028 m-3. This value is derived using the formula n = (D * NA) / m, where D is the density (9000 kg m-3), NA is Avogadro's number (6.02 x 1023 mol-1), and m is the atomic mass (64 amu). The calculation confirms that the density of conduction electrons is directly related to the material's density and atomic mass, providing a clear understanding of electron distribution in copper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Knowledge of atomic mass units (amu)
  • Familiarity with Avogadro's number
  • Basic principles of density calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Learn about the concept of Fermi energy in metals
  • Explore the relationship between electron density and material properties
  • Investigate the implications of conduction electron density on electrical conductivity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, materials science, and electrical engineering who are studying the properties of conductive materials, particularly metals like copper.

teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Monovalent copper (one conduction electron per atom) has a density of 9000 kg m-3 and atomic mass of 64 amu (ie. 1 kmole = 64kg). Find:

a)The density of conduction electrons per unit volume

b)the Fermi energy in electron volts

Homework Equations



f(E) = 1/(e(E-EF)/KT+1)

ρ=m/V

The Attempt at a Solution



So this is the first problem I've done on Fermi-Dirac so I'm a bit stuck here.

So I got the volume from V=m/ρ, so:

V=64/9000=.007m3

Is this even relevant to the question? Really lost and any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have to use the formula n=DNA/m

where:

NA=Avogadros No. = 6.02x1023 mol-1
D=Density=9000 kg m-3=9000000 g m-3
m=64 amu= g mol-1

I used the formula to get n=(9000000)(6.02x1023)/64=8.4375x1028 m-3

Is this the answer for part a)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K