What is the depth of the weight below the beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shivansh Mathur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Strings
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a weight supported by two strings attached to a horizontal beam. The main question is about the meaning of "depth" in relation to the weight's position below the beam. Participants clarify that the weight can be treated as a point mass and emphasize the importance of accurately representing the forces and angles in the diagram. They suggest writing down equilibrium conditions and revising the diagram to reflect the correct direction of forces. The conversation concludes with an agreement on the necessary adjustments to the diagram for clarity.
Shivansh Mathur
Messages
39
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A weight is supported by 2 stings 1.3m and 2m long fastened to two points on a horizontal beam 2m apart. What is the depth of the weight below the beam?

My question is- what does it mean by the "depth" of the beam?

Homework Equations


i'm new to the topic.

The Attempt at a Solution


the diagram which i made:
IMG_0102.JPG

please help in finding a solution. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand the problem, the weight is not a beam as you have drawn it but is, instead, small enough to be considered to be a point. The strings hang at angles to support it.
 
I don't think your picture is right. Re-read the problem and try again.

Also, you should write down the equilibrium conditions as the relevant equations.
 
In which context did you get this homework or which cours are you attending? Because to me it seems, that you only have to calculate the distance of the weight from the beam - maybe for the center of the mass (which you have already found, but the force (vector) - if the drawn arrow should indicate this - points in the wrong direction).
 
The new diagram should be like this then:
IMG_0103.JPG
 
stockzahn said:
In which context did you get this homework or which cours are you attending? Because to me it seems, that you only have to calculate the distance of the weight from the beam - maybe for the center of the mass (which you have already found, but the force (vector) - if the drawn arrow should indicate this - points in the wrong direction).

no no! that arrow i have just drawn to label, it's not the direction of the vector.
 
Shivansh Mathur said:
The new diagram should be like this then:
Yes, that's it.
 
Back
Top