What is the Difference Between Magnetic and Electric Flux?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux is defined as the number of magnetic field lines passing through a closed surface, while electric flux refers to the number of electric field lines through a closed surface. A closed surface fully encloses a volume, with one normal pointing inside and the other into open space. Although flux can be calculated for both open and closed surfaces, closed surfaces are particularly relevant in Gauss's Law for electric flux, as they relate to the charge enclosed. In contrast, magnetic flux is typically calculated for open surfaces, as the flux through a closed surface is zero, and changes in flux through open surfaces induce potential. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for applying concepts in electromagnetism effectively.
epilot
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello guys,

just have a question.
are these definitions true for the magnetic flux and electric flux??:
Magnetic flux: The number of magnetic filed lines which are passing through a CLOSED surface.

Electric flux: The number of electric field lines which are passing through a CLOSED surface.

What is your idea about Closed surface in the above sentences?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, when calculating the flux of a field, the surface can be either open or closed.

However, in some applications, most notably Gauss's Law, you specifically need to use a closed surface.
 
Thanks,

So when we want to define those ones then what do we tell??
 
A closed surface is a surface that fully encloses a volume. More specifically, of the two normals that the surface has, one will always be inside a fully enclosed volume while the other will always point into the open space.
 
Flux can be calculated for either. You can calculate the electric flux through either an open or closed surface, but the closed surface is usually more useful since it is related to the charge enclosed by Gauss's Law.

Conversely, magnetic flux is more often calculated for open surfaces since (ignoring the possibility of magnetic monopoles) the magnetic flux through a closed surface is zero. The rate of change of flux through an open surface however gives you the induced potential.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top