What is the difference between Nuclear Fission and Fusion?

AI Thread Summary
Nuclear fission involves the splitting of heavy atomic nuclei, such as Uranium-235, into smaller, radioactive nuclei, releasing energy through neutron collisions. In contrast, nuclear fusion combines light atomic nuclei, like deuterium and tritium, to form a larger, more stable nucleus, such as helium, requiring high temperatures to overcome the Coulomb force. Fission can occur at room temperature under the right conditions, while fusion requires extreme conditions to initiate. Additionally, there is speculation about low energy nuclear reactions (LENR), which involve medium atomic number isotopes, but these remain largely theoretical and unproven. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of nuclear science.
DrPosh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Just curious, I am new to learning about nuclear science and would like to know some differences between Fission and Fusion. Thanks in advance!

-Posh
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fission is when a heavy nucleus (such as U-235) splits into smaller nuclei. Fusion is when lighter nuclei (such as deuterium and tritium) combine to make a larger nucleus.
 
Both get their energy from the difference in mass between the fuel and the end products.

Fission breaks apart very high atomic number atoms, which are naturally unstable. The pieces are medium atomic number, but these pieces have many extra neutrons for their number of protons, and are thus very radioactive. The fission reaction is caused by a neutron colliding with the unstable nucleus, so there is no minimum energy, and fission can and does occur at room temperature, in the proper setup.

Fusion combines two very low atomic number atoms, into more stable versions, such as Hydrogen into Helium. The targets of fusion are often "magic", that is they are somewhat like a ball made of smaller balls that Tesselate nicely in 3D. These fusion targets show on a graph of binding energy per nucleon as a tall spike... He4, O16, and so on. Because the point of fusion is getting atomic nuclei with charge to collide, it requires the atoms move fast enough to overcome the natural repulsion of the Coulomb force long enough for the strong force to interact. This means fusion cannot occur under normal circumstances.

The third possibility for nuclear energy is to make combinations of medium atomic number isotopes with a light isotope, a so-called "low energy nuclear reaction." This is about as believable as alchemy, but so was chemistry at one point. There is some talk about using neutrinos to temporarily cause hydrogen to turn into a neutron, for instance. LENR would be cool if it was real, but right now it just makes for good Science Fiction.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top