What is the difference between 'Physics' and 'Fundamentals of Physics'

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsisgrea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing two physics textbooks: "Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Krane, and "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. The primary distinction lies in their intended audience and approach. "Physics" is noted for its suitability for both engineers and science majors, while "Fundamentals of Physics" is more focused on applied physics, particularly for engineering students. The choice of which textbook is better for an undergraduate introductory course on Newtonian mechanics, electromagnetism, and optics depends on the learner's goals. For self-study, utilizing an OpenCourseWare (OCW) course alongside a textbook might provide a more structured learning experience. The consensus leans towards "Physics" being more comprehensive and suitable for undergraduate courses, with "Fundamentals of Physics" offering a more basic approach with simplified examples.
physicsisgrea
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the book descriptions, "Physics" is suitable for engineers and science majors and "Fundamentals of Physics" is for engineers. So, it sounds like the latter is geared towards more of an applied approach to the material. So, which one is "better" depends entirely on what you wish to get out of it.
 
Is this for self-study? Consider whether it would be better to choose an OCW course and get the textbook, so you have a structured plan and extra assignments and exams to help you.

PS. I mention this because you mentioned suitability for an undergraduate course.
 
I used both these books in high school. IMO "Physics" is way better.
 
I have also used both recently, Krane is more advanced than Walker. So for Undergrad Course (Review Introductory Physics Book) you can go with Resnick, Halliday & Krane Text. (I have its 5th Edition)
 
I'm sure it will tell you in the preface. Each textbook is usually aimed at a particular level. "Fundamental physics" sounds as if it is aimed at teaching the basic classical physics and with simplified examples. The "Physics" textbook could be aimed at ANY level, out of context.
 

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

High Energy What is the level of Aitchison & Hey's QFT books?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Engineering Need Advice on Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics Textbook
Replies
2
Views
2K
High Energy (free kindle) Gauge Theories in Particle Physics by Aitchison & Hey
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classical What is the Difference Between the 4th and 5th Edition of HRK Physics?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Self teaching Calculus for physics?
Replies
11
Views
4K
Intro Physics Competitive Physics by Jinhui Wang and Bernard Ricardo
Replies
2
Views
3K
Intro Physics Seeking a good Undergraduate physics textbook
Replies
7
Views
12K
Particle Thomson (Modern Particle Physics) & Schwartz (Quantum Field Theory)
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
Intro Physics Fundamentals of Physics by David Halliday
Replies
4
Views
7K
Looking for Readings on Dark Matter
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top