What is the Diffraction-Limited Object Size at 25 cm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dancergirlie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
dancergirlie
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the diffraction-limited object size (at 25 cm) imposed by the numerical aperture of the eye (if the eye is a diffraction-limited optic)? Use 4mm for the iris diameter and 550 nm for the wavelength.

Homework Equations


Rayleigh criterion states: for angular resolution, theta:
sin(theta)=1.22(wavelength)/Diameter


The Attempt at a Solution



I can solve for the angular resolution, which I got as 1.6775E-4. However, I don't know how to solve for the object size from that. Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you have an angle and a distance - you can get the size.
Picture it as a narrow triangle of rays going from your eye to a distance of 25cm.
- draw a diagram.

Hint. if the angle is small and in radians then it's even easier
 
would I have to take the half-angle of that in order to make a right triangle, or is the angle that I solved for before? If I do have to take the half angle, would I have to multiply the object size by 2?
 
Yes the formula you have is for the half angle.
The diffraction limit (in radians) is approx 2 * wavelength / diameter

You should also learn somethign about the sin() of small angles in radians,
 
wouldn't that have to be tangent and not sin. Yes, I know about paraxial approximation where tantheta and sintheta would be approximately theta. So, I would take 2*25E-2m*(theta)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top