What is the direction of forces exerted on a plank by a wall in statics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nahanksh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the direction of forces exerted on a plank by a wall in a statics problem. Initially, it is believed that the force from the wall is upwards, but this is identified as incorrect. Participants emphasize the importance of considering all forces acting on the plank, including horizontal and vertical components. A key suggestion is to take moments about a specific point to simplify the analysis and eliminate unknown forces from consideration. Ultimately, understanding the direction of these forces requires careful analysis of the system's equilibrium.
nahanksh
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys211/oldexams/exam3/sp08/fig15.gif

The force exerted on the plank by the wall is upwards. (True/False)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



In statics, when using \sumFy = 0, i thought the forces exerting on the wall should cancel the force of gravity (weight : mg).. That's the reason why i thought the statement to be TRUE. But it's actually FALSE...

How to decide the direction of forces?
(I am always confused with this..)

Please could someone help me out here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nahanksh! :smile:
nahanksh said:
In statics, when using \sumFy = 0, i thought the forces exerting on the wall should cancel the force of gravity (weight : mg).

But you're forgetting the force from the pointy thingy … that's three forces that have to cancel, and you have no idea what that extra force is.

Hint: when you don't know what a force is, and you don't want to know, always take moments about a point which you choose so that that force has zero moment. :wink:
 
I don't quite get the hint you have given...

Are you saying that there is both horizontal and vertical forces in the point thing?
(Then, the answer is FALSE because it has upward AND downward forces?)

I am so confused...T_T
 
nahanksh said:
Are you saying that there is both horizontal and vertical forces in the point thing?

Hi nahanksh! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

I'm not interested in the forces at the point thing.

Just follow my hint! :wink:​
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi nahanksh! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

I'm not interested in the forces at the point thing.

Just follow my hint! :wink:​


I don't understand still...

We ARE interested in the point thing because it's only point related to the WALL..

How do we know the direction of the forces by the wall without considering that point..?

Please give me a little bit more of a hint...
 
nahanksh said:
How do we know the direction of the forces by the wall without considering that point..?

By taking moments about that point, so that the force at that point is multiplied by zero.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

What is the third force acting on a plank attached to a wall by a hinge?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Direction of force exerted by ground for the ladder problem
Replies
2
Views
3K
Contact force of block on a wall
Replies
5
Views
3K
Direction of The Force of a Wall Exerted on a Rod
Replies
3
Views
2K
Calculating Net Torque for Disk in Diagram D
Replies
1
Views
1K
Which Force is Represented by the Gradient of the Ball-Wall Collision Graph?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Magnitude of the force of static friction
Replies
2
Views
2K
Magnitude of static friction force
Replies
7
Views
4K
What is the ranking of forces in a problem on ranking forces?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Find the frictional force between a block and a wall
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top