What Is the E/U Ratio for a Half Reflection Coefficient in Quantum Tunneling?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the E/U ratio for a reflection coefficient of 1/2 in quantum tunneling, the relationship between transmission and reflection coefficients is crucial. The reflection coefficient is defined as (k1-k2)^2 / (k1+k2)^2, where k1 and k2 depend on the particle's energy and the barrier height. The discussion highlights the challenge of isolating a numerical ratio without specific values for mass and energy, as these variables are intrinsic to the equations. Participants suggest expanding the reflection coefficient to explore potential simplifications. Ultimately, the problem emphasizes the complexity of deriving a simple numerical ratio from the given quantum mechanics equations.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


A particle of energy E approaches a step barrier of height U. What should be the ratio E/U be so that the reflection coefficient is 1/2.


Homework Equations


Transmission + Reflection = 1
Transmission = e^(-2a*alpha)
a = mw∏/h
alpha^2 = (8m∏^2/h^2)(U-E)

Reflection = (k1-k2)^2 / (k1+k2)^2



The Attempt at a Solution


So this is a little bit messy.. I assume most people that are going to help me are familiar with these basic transmission and reflection equations. Anyway is there a possible way to solve this problem an get a ratio that is JUST a number? wouldn't you always have other variables in it since it's talking about a completely undefined particle? there are no ways to get the m's and w's out of the equations right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All those k's depend on energy.
Expand them out in the reflection coefficient and see what happens.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Correct Setup for Finite Difference to Calculate Quantum Tunneling
Replies
2
Views
887
Quantum Tunelling Problem with Boundary Conditions
Replies
3
Views
2K
Classical behavior, 3 dimension wave function and reflection
Replies
2
Views
1K
E<V Potential Step Confusion
Replies
7
Views
2K
Tunneling with an alpha particle
Replies
6
Views
6K
Calculating Quantum Tunneling Probability - 1.524 eV, 343 pm, 2.654 eV
Replies
1
Views
1K
Percentage of Electrons Tunneling Through?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Mutilple beam reflection question in Fabry-Perot cavity
Replies
1
Views
2K
Archived How Does an Infinitely High Potential Wall Impact Quantum Wave Functions?
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Does Quantum Tunneling Affect Electron Confinement in Potential Wells?
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top