What is the effect of a complex potential energy on particle absorption?

Felicity
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



suppose V(x) is complex, obtain an expression for

∂/∂t P(x,t) and
d/dt ∫-∞dxP(x,t)

for absorption of particles the last quantity must be negative (since particles disappear, the probability of their being anywhere decreases). What does this tell us about the imaginary part of V(x)? (ch 2, problem 11 gasiorowicz)


Homework Equations



V(x) is the potential energy

schrodinger equation

∂/∂t P(x,t)= (∂ψ*)/∂t ψ+ψ*∂ψ/∂t

∂/∂t ∫-∞dxP(x,t)=-∫-∞dx ∂/∂x j(x,t)= 0

where j(x,t) is the probability current

but these may only be valid if V(x) is real

why?

The Attempt at a Solution



I see how one can calculate

∂/∂t P(x,t)= (∂ψ*)/∂t ψ+ψ*∂ψ/∂t

by plugging in the general schrodinger equation and its complex conjugate but in this situation V(x) must be real

Why does the potential energy V(x) have to be real though?

How would you find ∂/∂t P(x,t) if V(x) were complex?

I have not yet taken a complex analysis class so any recommendations of topics in complex analysis to look up would be appreciated

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, write down the Schrodinger equation:

i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 \Psi + V\Psi

and then it's complex conjugate (the same equation, only every imaginary unit must be added a minus sign). Then multiply each of them by \Psi and \Psi^* correspondingly and subtract. You'll see that if potential V has an imaginary part, it doesn't cancel and thus

\frac{\partial P}{\partial t} \neq 0

so the probability for finding the particle decreases in time.
 
Thank you so much! I guess I just didn't see that making V(x) complex is as simple as turning it into (V(x) + some imaginary part)
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top