What is the Efficiency of a Heat Engine?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
37 replies · 8K views
Okay so:

[tex]Work = Q_1_2 - Q_3_1[/tex]

[tex]Q_{12) = (C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1[/tex]

Okay so Q23

Q = U + W along path 23

W = 0

[tex]\Delta U = C_P \Delta T[/tex] (V const)

using Ideal gas law, T = PV/nR

[tex]\Delta T = \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta U = C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}[/tex]

[tex]Q_{23} = C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}[/tex]


So:

[tex]e = \frac{Work}{Q_{12}}[/tex]

[tex]Work = \left(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1\right) - \left(C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}\right)[/tex]

[tex]e = \frac{\left(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1\right) - \left(C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}\right)}{(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1}[/tex]


So does this look okay now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TFM said:
...
So:

[tex]e = \frac{Work}{Q_{12}}[/tex]

[tex]Work = \left(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1\right) - \left(C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}\right)[/tex]

[tex]e = \frac{\left(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1\right) - \left(C_P \frac{P_3V_3}{nR} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}\right)}{(C_V (\frac{p_1v_3}{nR} - \frac{p_1v_1}{nR}) + (V_3 - V_1)P_1}[/tex]
Try:

[itex]Q_{12} = n\gamma C_v(T_2-T_1)[/itex] and [itex]Q_{23} = nC_v(T_3-T_2)[/itex]

[tex]\eta = W/Q_h = \frac{Q_{12} - Q_{23}}{Q_{12}} = \frac{(\gamma(T_2-T_1) - (T_3 - T_2)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

Work out T1 and T3 using:

[tex]TV^{\gamma-1} = const.[/tex]

ie.

[tex]T_3 = T_1\left(\frac{V_1}{V_3}\right)^{\gamma-1} = \frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\left(\frac{V_1}{V_3}\right)^{\gamma-1}[/tex]

[tex]T_2 = P_1V_3/nR[/tex]

AM
 
I see. So:

[tex]Q = n C_P \Delta T[/tex]

From the expression for gamma,

[tex]C_p = f C_V[/tex] (I am using f because gamma doesn't show well on latex)

so

[tex]Q = n f C_V \Delta T[/tex]


[tex]Q_{12} = n f C_V (T_2 - T_1)[/tex]

[tex]Q_{23} = n C_V (T_3 - T_2)[/tex]


[tex]e = W/Q_h = \frac{Q_{12} - Q_{23}}{Q_{12}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{Q_{12} - Q_{23}}{Q_{12}} = \frac{nf C_V (T_2 - T_1) - n C_V (T_3 - T_2)}{n f C_V (T_2 - T_1)}[/tex]

Cancels to:

[tex]\frac{Q_{12} - Q_{23}}{Q_{12}} = \frac{f(T_2 - T_1) - (T_3 - T_2)}{f(T_2 - T_1)}[/tex]

so using adiabatic law:

[tex]TV^f = c[/tex]

[tex]T_{1}V_{1}^{f -1}= T_{3}V_{3}^{f-1}[/tex]

[tex]T_{1}= T_{3}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}}[/tex]

Use ideal gas law:

T = PV/nR

[tex]\T_1= \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}}[/tex]

[tex]T_2 = \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}[/tex]

[tex]T_3 = \frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}}[/tex]

so:

[tex]\frac{(f(\frac{P_1V_3} - \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}}) - (\frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}} - \frac{P_1V_3})}{f(\frac{P_1V_3} - \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}})}[/tex]

Okay so far?
 
TFM said:
I
[tex]\frac{(f(\frac{P_1V_3} - \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}}) - (\frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}} - \frac{P_1V_3})}{f(\frac{P_1V_3} - \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}})}[/tex]

Okay so far?
Notice that:

[tex]\eta = \frac{(\gamma(T_2-T_1) - (T_3 - T_2)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

reduces to:

[tex]\eta = 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

So you just have to show that:

[tex]\frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{(T_2-T_1)} = \frac{(1-\frac{P_3}{P_1})}{(1-\frac{V_3}{V_1})}[/tex]

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Notice that:

[tex]\eta = \frac{(\gamma(T_2-T_1) - (T_3 - T_2)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

reduces to:

[tex]\eta = 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

I see that now.

[tex]\eta = \frac{(\gamma(T_2-T_1) - (T_3 - T_2)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

is the same as:

[tex]\eta = \frac{(\gamma(T_2-T_1)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)} - \frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{\gamma(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

Which cancels down to:

[tex]\eta = 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

Okay so:

[tex]\frac{(T_3 - T_2)}{(T_2-T_1)}[/tex]

[tex]T_1= \frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}}[/tex]

[tex]T_2 = \frac{P_1V_3}{nR}[/tex]

[tex]T_3 = \frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}}[/tex]

So:

[tex]\frac{(\frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR})}{(\frac{P_1V_3}{nR} -\frac{P_3V_3}{nR}\frac{V_{3}^{f-1}}{V_{1}^{f -1}})}[/tex]

Factorise out:

[tex]\frac{(\frac{P_1V_1}{nR}\frac{V_{1}^{f-1}}{V_{3}^{f -1}} - \frac{P_1V_3}{nR})}{\frac{V_3}{nR}(P_1 - P_3 \frac{V_3^{\gamma - 1}}{v_1^{\gamma - 1}})}[/tex]

and:

[tex]\frac{\frac{p_1}{nR}(v_1\frac{v_1^{\gamma - 1}}{v_3^{\gamma - 1}} - V_3)}{\frac{V_3}{nR}(P_1 - P_3 \frac{V_3^{\gamma - 1}}{v_1^{\gamma - 1}})}[/tex]


Does this look okay so far?
 
I am also assuming that the nR can cancel, so:

[tex]P_1(v_1\frac{v_1^{\gamma - 1}}{v_3^{\gamma - 1}} - V_3)}{V_3(P_1 - P_3 \frac{V_3^{\gamma - 1}}{v_1^{\gamma - 1}})}[/tex]

Does this look right?
 
To be honest I have lost track. However, it would be desirable to simplify the term
v1 v1γ-1​
The idea is, once you have an expression for the efficiency, for you to manipulate and simplify it algebraically and get

[tex] e = 1 - \frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{1 - \frac{p_3}{p_1}}{1 - \frac{v_1}{v_3}}\right) [/tex]​

which, as I had mentioned earlier, has a typo corrected from what was given in Post #1 (v1/v3 instead of v3/v1).
 
Oops, my Latex went a bit wrong. it should have been:

[tex]\frac{P_1(v_1\frac{v_1^{\gamma - 1}}{v_3^{\gamma - 1}} - V_3)}{V_3(P_1 - P_3 \frac{V_3^{\gamma - 1}}{v_1^{\gamma - 1}})}[/tex]