What is the electric field at the center of curvature of an arc?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the electric field at the center of curvature of an arc with an arbitrary angle alpha. The user is confused about why the solution only provides a Y component for the electric field, questioning the absence of an X component and the use of sine instead of cosine in the calculations. It is clarified that the orientation of the arc affects the components of the electric field, and if aligned differently, both components could exist. The integration method is suggested to be performed along the direction of the electric field, which is influenced by the arc's orientation. Ultimately, the confusion arises from the provided picture and its alignment with the axes.
Thomas_
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the field at the center of curvature of an arc of arbitary angle \alpha

(\alpha is with the x-axis)


Homework Equations


E=\frac{kQ}{R^2}\widehat{r}

S=R\alpha

\lambda=\frac{Q}{S}

The Attempt at a Solution


I divide the arc into small pieces ds. ds=rd\alpha

\lambda = \frac{dQ}{ds}

This gives me: dE = \frac{k\lambda d \alpha}{R}\widehat{r}
I would have to integrate this / its components (X and Y)

the solution I'm given is: E_y=\frac{2k \lambda sin(\frac{\alpha}{2})}{R}

However, I don't understand the following: Why is there only a solution for Y? As far as I can tell the X components don't cancel since its an arc of arbitrary length, not a half or full circle. Also, shouldn't the Y component be in terms of cos? The angle alpha is with the X axis, I don't understand why E_y would be in terms of sin (since it become cos after integration).

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like they oriented the arc so that it's centered on the y-axis. (The statement that "\alpha is with the x-axis" does seem a bit odd.) Of course the easy way to solve the problem regardless of the orientation of the arc, is to align it with some axis, solve the integral as show, then transform it back to the given axis.
 
Well, they give me a picture with the arc starting from the positive x axis, going through an angle alpha which is counterclockwise from the positive x-axis. That's what is confusing me...

Also, shouldn't there be two components to the elctric field? X and y? Regardless of where the arc is oriented?
 
Thomas_ said:
Well, they give me a picture with the arc starting from the positive x axis, going through an angle alpha which is counterclockwise from the positive x-axis. That's what is confusing me...
That does seem to contradict the answer.

Also, shouldn't there be two components to the elctric field? X and y? Regardless of where the arc is oriented?
By symmetry, you know the electric field must be along the line from the center of curvature to the midpoint of the arc. To find the magnitude, just choose an axis along that direction to do your integration.

Whether the field has x and y components depends on its orientation to the axis. If the arc were centered on the x-axis, it would only have an x-component. For whatever reason, in contradiction to the picture you were given, they chose to align the arc with the y-axis. But according to how you described the picture, it would have both an x and y component.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top