What is the electric field at this point?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at a specific point due to a uniformly charged rod. A charge of -3.2 micro-coulombs is distributed along a 1.2-meter rod, and the electric field needs to be determined at a distance of 3.4 meters from the rod's end. The user applied the formula E = kq/r^2 and set up an integral for the electric field, incorporating charge density and using u-substitution for integration. There is some uncertainty about the method and the clarity of the problem's geometry, particularly regarding the measurement point and direction for distance (b). The final calculated electric field value is -1840 N/C.
Luke0034
Messages
26
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A charge -3.2 micro-coulombs is spread evenly throughout a rod of length (a). At a distance (b) from the rod, what is the electric field?

a = 1.2 m
b = 3.4 m

So basically, you start at zero and then there's a line of charge horizontally to the right from 0 to 1.2 meters, and then at 3.4 meters to the right of the origin there is a point that is distance b away from the end of (a), and I need to find the electric field there.

Homework Equations



E = kq/r^2

charge density = dq/dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I used E = kq/r^2

I knew that the charge density = dq/dx

So I set up the integration like this: E = integral(k/r^2)dq

Then I switched to terms of dx... E = integral((k * charge density)/r^2)dx

Then I plugged in 3.4 + x for r... E = integral((k * charge density)/(3.4 + x)^2)dx

k and the charge density were constants for I pulled the out of the integral and integrated 1/(3.4+x)^2dx from 0 to 1.2. I did used u substitution to do this.I was wondering if I used the correct method here, and if my answer was correct.

I got -1840 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Luke,
I think you're doing just fine. Why the hesitation ?
 
Luke0034 said:
At a distance (b) from the rod, what is the electric field?
This is rather vague. You need to specify the geometry more precisely. From where on the rod is (b) measured and in what direction?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top