What is the Electrostatic Potential Energy of a Charged Spherical Conductor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic potential energy of an isolated spherical conductor with a radius of 24 cm charged to 3.9 kV. The key equation used is U = (kQ)/r, but the charge (Q) is not provided, leading to confusion about how to derive the energy in Joules. Participants clarify that the voltage represents electrostatic potential energy, and the work done to charge the sphere can be expressed as W = 1/2 * V * Q, with additional insights on relating this to the energy stored in a capacitor. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need to connect voltage, charge, and radius to find the potential energy accurately. Understanding these relationships is essential for solving the problem effectively.
clickcaptain
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the electrostatic potential energy of an isolated spherical conductor of radius 24 cm that is charged to 3.9 kV?


Homework Equations



Electric potential

U = (kQ)/r



The Attempt at a Solution



U = ((8.99 * 109 ) * (3.9 * 103)/(0.24)

Could someone walk me through how to do this? Its a simple problem I know...but I'm not understanding it, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may be confusing kV with Coulombs here.

The Voltage is your electrostatic potential energy and is supplied by the kQ/R relationship.

But they didn't give you the charge on the sphere.
 
The answer has to be formatted in Joules.. so its work, but I'm not exactly sure how to get work from an energy field.
 
So then you're wanting to know how much work is required to charge a sphere?

So Work = V * q

As you bring the charges to the sphere, there will be work for each charge carried in from ∞. The average ΔV will be 1/2*V that the charges will need to be brought in against. That means for all the charges the total work will be 1/2*V*Q - where Q is the total charge.

But we also know that V = kQ/R, so rewriting we have

W = 1/2*V*(V*R/k) = 1/2V2*R/k

Or if you looked at it like a capacitor - a spherical one floating in space - then you can start from Q = V*C and since the potential energy in a capacitor is 1/2Q2/C you can rewrite that as 1/2*k*Q2/R = 1/2*V2R/k
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top