eis3nheim said:
Can you please explain to me this statement The farther an electron is from the nucleus, the higher is the energy state, and any electron that has left its parent atom has a higher energy state than any electron in
the atomic structure.
And is the meaning of electron state.
It seems to me that this OP is about the definition of Potential Energy, more than QM. The fact that electrons around a nucleus can only have certain fixed levels of potential energy is important but not really relevant to the high or low description of the states.
For an attractive situation, the potential energy is less than zero because Potential at a point is defined by 'the work needed to bring a charge from infinity to that point'. When the forces are attractive, clearly, work is got out so the work put in is negative.
So. .. . at infinity, the potential is zero, which is
higher than the potential of anywhere nearer (all negative values).
However, with the inverse square law at work, the amount of energy available for a given change in position is greater, the nearer you get (the 'well' is steeper near the centre. It is potential
difference that is of most interest, in many cases and the absolute potential is not very relevant. Getting ones head around this can be difficult but it does make sense - really!